Orca Security vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest

Print / Save PDF

Orca Security (Orca Security) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Orca Security is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, GovRAMP, TX-RAMP.

Columns

Orca Security SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Orca Security	SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
Vendor	Orca Security	SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))
HQ	Israel · Middle East	Germany · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Code security
Summary	AI-powered cloud security platform (CNAPP) for agentless workload and cloud posture risk detection.	German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	SOC 2, ISO 27001, GovRAMP, TX-RAMP	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	ISO 27001, SOC 2
Capabilities / tasks	cloud security, vulnerability management, compliance posture	pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface
Pricing (as published)	Not verified	Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://orca.security/	https://squr.ai/
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://orca.security/	https://squr.ai/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Orca Security and SQUR Autonomous Pentest?

Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: vulnerability-management. Orca Security-only tasks: cloud-security, compliance-posture. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Orca Security: Not published SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.

Where are Orca Security and SQUR Autonomous Pentest headquartered?

Orca Security publishes HQ in Israel. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Orca Security or SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
• Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)

Related

• Orca Security alternatives
• SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Orca Security comparisons

• Wiz vs Orca Security
• Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Orca Security
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Orca Security
• Conveyor vs Orca Security
• Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security

More SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
• Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)