Pixee vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning
Quick answer
Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Pixee (automated triage and fix) (Pixee) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Pixee (automated triage and fix) |  Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Pixee | Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. | London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2 (vendor's own certification) |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management | pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote. | Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial. |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.pixee.ai/platform | https://sourcery.ai/security |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.pixee.ai/platform | https://sourcery.ai/security |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Pixee and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, sca. Pixee-only tasks: remediation, vulnerability-management. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: pr-review, secrets-detection, iac, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Pixee (automated triage and fix): Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Where are Pixee and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?
Pixee (automated triage and fix) publishes HQ in United States. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Pixee (automated triage and fix) or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Pixee (automated triage and fix) alternatives
- Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Pixee (automated triage and fix) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Pixee (automated triage and fix)
More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)