Home / Compare / Qodo multi-agent code review vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Qodo multi-agent code review vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Quick answer

Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Qodo multi-agent code review	Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
Vendor	Qodo (Codium Ltd.)	Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)
HQ	Israel · Middle East	United Kingdom · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security	Code security, Security
Summary	Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner.	London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	SOC 2 (vendor's own certification)
Capabilities / tasks	pr review, appsec, code quality	pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality
Pricing (as published)	Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page.	Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Pricing model	published-tiers	freemium
Primary source	https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/	https://sourcery.ai/security
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/	https://sourcery.ai/security

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Qodo multi-agent code review and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pr-review, appsec, code-quality. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: none. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: sast, secrets-detection, sca, iac. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.

Where are Qodo multi-agent code review and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?

Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Qodo multi-agent code review or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons

More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons