Qodo multi-agent code review vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Quick answer
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Qodo multi-agent code review (Qodo (Codium Ltd.)) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Qodo multi-agent code review |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Qodo (Codium Ltd.) | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | Israel · Middle East | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Agentic pull-request review platform (formerly CodiumAI) that flags bugs, security issues and rule violations with organisational context. A general code reviewer, not a dedicated SAST scanner. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, code quality | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.qodo.ai/products/qodo-merge/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Qodo multi-agent code review and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Qodo multi-agent code review-only tasks: pr-review, code-quality. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Qodo multi-agent code review: Free 14-day trial. Pro Team plan (designed for up to 30 users) is listed from $30 on qodo.ai/pricing with pooled credit packs at $0.012 per credit (for example 2,500 credits ≈ 18 reviews/month); Enterprise (30+ users, SSO, on-prem, BYOK) is custom. Confirm the billing unit on the vendor page. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec): Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
Where are Qodo multi-agent code review and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI headquartered?
Qodo multi-agent code review publishes HQ in Israel. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) publishes HQ in Spain.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Qodo multi-agent code review or Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Qodo multi-agent code review alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Qodo multi-agent code review comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Qodo multi-agent code review
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)