Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: vulnerability-management, iac. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI-only tasks: sca, secrets-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec): Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) publishes HQ in Spain.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Aikido AI AutoFix alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)