SQUR Autonomous Pentest vs Tenable One
Quick answer
SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) and Tenable One (Hexa AI) (Tenable) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Tenable One (Hexa AI) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) |  Tenable One (Hexa AI) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt)) | Tenable |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Risk |
| Summary | German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new. | Exposure management platform with Tenable Hexa AI agentic orchestration for vulnerability triage and remediation workflows. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | TX-RAMP |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | ISO 27001, SOC 2 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface | vulnerability management, exposure management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://squr.ai/ | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one/capabilities/hexa-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://squr.ai/ | https://www.tenable.com/products/tenable-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between SQUR Autonomous Pentest and Tenable One?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: vulnerability-management. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, attack-surface. Tenable One-only tasks: exposure-management, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan. Tenable One (Hexa AI): Not published
Where are SQUR Autonomous Pentest and Tenable One headquartered?
SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany. Tenable One (Hexa AI) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) or Tenable One (Hexa AI). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) alternatives
- Tenable One (Hexa AI) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)