Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Hadrian Nova
Quick answer
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage (Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage (Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.) | Hadrian |
| HQ | United States · North America | Netherlands · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | API-based 'agentic email security' that re-analyses inbound mail after native filtering with ML and LLM reasoning and removes confirmed threats across every inbox automatically (configurable human-in-the-loop thresholds). AI Phish Triage classifies employee-reported emails and acts on them, feeding Adaptive's simulations and awareness training. | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK |
| Capabilities / tasks | email security, phishing triage, remediation, threat detection | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and Hadrian Nova?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage-only tasks: email-security, phishing-triage, remediation, threat-detection. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage: Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products) Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing).
Where are Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and Hadrian Nova headquartered?
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage publishes HQ in United States. Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage or Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage alternatives
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)