Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Codacy AI Reviewer
Quick answer
Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) and Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Amazon Q Developer security scanning (Amazon Web Services) and Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Codacy |
| HQ | United States · North America | Portugal · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes. | Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, remediation | pr review, appsec, sast, code quality, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page. | Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazonq/latest/qdeveloper-ug/code-reviews.html | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Amazon Q Developer security scanning and Codacy AI Reviewer?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation. Amazon Q Developer security scanning-only tasks: secrets-detection, sca, iac. Codacy AI Reviewer-only tasks: pr-review, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Amazon Q Developer security scanning: Free Tier with monthly limits; Amazon Q Developer Pro is $19 per user/month on aws.amazon.com/q/developer/pricing. Security scanning is a capability of those tiers, not a separately priced SKU on that page. Codacy AI Reviewer: Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom.
Where are Amazon Q Developer security scanning and Codacy AI Reviewer headquartered?
Amazon Q Developer security scanning publishes HQ in United States. Codacy AI Reviewer publishes HQ in Portugal.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Amazon Q Developer security scanning or Codacy AI Reviewer. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning alternatives
- Codacy AI Reviewer alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Amazon Q Developer security scanning comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Codacy AI Reviewer comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Codacy AI Reviewer