Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  Codacy AI Reviewer |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | Codacy |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | Portugal · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | pr review, appsec, sast, code quality, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and Codacy AI Reviewer?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, sast. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: vulnerability-management, iac. Codacy AI Reviewer-only tasks: pr-review, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. Codacy AI Reviewer: Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom.
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and Codacy AI Reviewer headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. Codacy AI Reviewer publishes HQ in Portugal.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Aikido AI AutoFix or Codacy AI Reviewer. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
More Codacy AI Reviewer comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Checkmarx One Assist vs Codacy AI Reviewer