Amnify security agents vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) (Amnify (Amnify GmbH)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) (Amnify (Amnify GmbH)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amnify (Amnify GmbH) | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | Germany · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation, pen test management, cloud security | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://amnify.ai/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://amnify.ai/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Amnify security agents and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation. Amnify security agents-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, iac, pr-review, pen-test-management, cloud-security. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: vulnerability-management, agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests): Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Amnify security agents and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) publishes HQ in Germany. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Checkmarx One Assist
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)