Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
Quick answer
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Aikido AI AutoFix (Aikido Security) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Aikido AI AutoFix |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Aikido Security | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | Belgium · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, remediation, sast, vulnerability management, iac | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.aikido.dev/code/autofix | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Aikido AI AutoFix and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, vulnerability-management. Aikido AI AutoFix-only tasks: sast, iac. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Aikido AI AutoFix: Published plans on aikido.dev/pricing include a free option and paid team plans (Basic listed at $300/month for 10 users on the pricing page at last check). Confirm current amounts on the vendor pricing page. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Aikido AI AutoFix and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Aikido AI AutoFix publishes HQ in Belgium. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Aikido AI AutoFix alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Aikido AI AutoFix comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amazon Q Developer security scanning
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Checkmarx One Assist
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Checkmarx One Assist vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)