Agent Index by Heritage Services
Submit / Claim
Home / Compare / Black Duck Signal vs StackHawk Wingman

Black Duck Signal vs StackHawk Wingman

Quick answer

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) (Black Duck) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
Vendor Black DuckStackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)
HQ United States · North AmericaUnited States · North America
Primary category Code securityCode security
Also listed in Code security, SecurityCode security, Security
Summary Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP.Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month.
Frameworks (vendor-stated) ——
Frameworks (vendor-claimed) ——
Capabilities / tasks appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability managementappsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations
Pricing (as published) Not publishedWingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Pricing model quotepublished-tiers
Primary source https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.htmlhttps://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/
Last checked 2026-10-182026-10-18
Official site https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.htmlhttps://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Black Duck Signal and StackHawk Wingman?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, vulnerability-management. Black Duck Signal-only tasks: sast. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec): Not published StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.

Where are Black Duck Signal and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?

Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) publishes HQ in United States. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.

Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Use-case comparisons

Related

More Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) comparisons

More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons