AWS Continuum for penetration testing vs Corma AI agents
Quick answer
AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) (Amazon Web Services) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) (Amazon Web Services) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) |  Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Corma (Corma SAS) |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | AWS frontier agent (formerly AWS Security Agent) that runs on-demand penetration tests of your applications with tailored multi-step attack scenarios, reproducible proof and ready-to-implement fixes, billed per task-hour. | French identity and SaaS-management product whose custom AI agents automate joiner-mover-leaver provisioning, offboarding and other identity actions in web apps even when no API, SCIM or SAML is available, using a browser-based agent that interprets the admin UI and executes the workflow steps. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, remediation | identity governance, access reviews, workflow automation, agentic ops |
| Pricing (as published) | $50.00 per task-hour (metered per second; concurrent tasks add up, so billable task-hours usually exceed wall-clock time). First three revalidations per finding are free; a free trial is offered (aws.amazon.com/continuum/pricing). | Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://aws.amazon.com/continuum/ | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://aws.amazon.com/continuum/ | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between AWS Continuum for penetration testing and Corma AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. AWS Continuum for penetration testing-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, vulnerability-management, remediation. Corma AI agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, workflow-automation, agentic-ops. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent): $50.00 per task-hour (metered per second; concurrent tasks add up, so billable task-hours usually exceed wall-clock time). First three revalidations per finding are free; a free trial is offered (aws.amazon.com/continuum/pricing). Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation): Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users.
Where are AWS Continuum for penetration testing and Corma AI agents headquartered?
AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) publishes HQ in United States. Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) or Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) alternatives
- Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing (formerly AWS Security Agent)
More Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)