Home / Compare / Claude Code security review vs Legit Security Agentic Remediation

Claude Code security review vs Legit Security Agentic Remediation

Quick answer

Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents) (Legit Security (Legit Security Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Claude Code security review	Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents)
Vendor	Anthropic	Legit Security (Legit Security Ltd)
HQ	United States · North America	Israel · Middle East
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.	Remediation agents in Legit's Agentic AppSec platform that prioritise SAST and SCA findings using reachability, exploitability and business context, write root-cause fixes (including dependency upgrades), re-scan to validate them and open pull requests across every affected repository for developers to review.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management	appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	GitHub / SCM pull requests, third-party AppSec scanners (ingested findings)
Pricing (as published)	Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key.	Not published; demo-led (Legit Security site, checked 2026-10-29).
Pricing model	published-tiers	quote
Primary source	https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code	https://www.legitsecurity.com/platform/agentic-remediation
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-29
Official site	https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code	https://www.legitsecurity.com/platform/agentic-remediation

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Claude Code security review and Legit Security Agentic Remediation?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, vulnerability-management. Claude Code security review-only tasks: pr-review. Legit Security Agentic Remediation-only tasks: remediation, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents): Not published; demo-led (Legit Security site, checked 2026-10-29).

Where are Claude Code security review and Legit Security Agentic Remediation headquartered?

Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States. Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents) publishes HQ in Israel.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)