Home / Compare / Claude Code security review vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Claude Code security review vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Quick answer

Claude Code security review (Anthropic) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Claude Code security review	Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
Vendor	Anthropic	Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)
HQ	United States · North America	United Kingdom · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments.	London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	SOC 2 (vendor's own certification)
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, pr review, sast, vulnerability management	pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality
Pricing (as published)	Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key.	Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Pricing model	published-tiers	freemium
Primary source	https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code	https://sourcery.ai/security
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://support.claude.com/en/articles/11932705-automated-security-reviews-in-claude-code	https://sourcery.ai/security

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Claude Code security review and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review, sast. Claude Code security review-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: secrets-detection, sca, iac, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Claude Code security review: Included with Claude Code for users on individual paid plans (Pro or Max) and pay-as-you-go API Console accounts, per Anthropic’s help centre. Public Claude plan list prices are on claude.com/pricing; the GitHub Action uses a Claude API key. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.

Where are Claude Code security review and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?

Claude Code security review publishes HQ in United States. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Claude Code security review or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

More Claude Code security review comparisons

More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons