CloudPeek agentic security operations platform vs Hadrian Nova
Quick answer
CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) (CloudPeek (CloudPeek Limited)) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) (CloudPeek (CloudPeek Limited)) and Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CloudPeek (CloudPeek Limited) | Hadrian |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | Netherlands · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | UK agentic SOC platform that sits on top of existing SIEM, cloud, endpoint and threat-intelligence tools: it automatically triages every new alert, runs AI-agent follow-up investigations across connected tools, writes the incident summary and can act within per-workflow authority levels (advise, approve, act), including in on-premises or fully air-gapped deployments. | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (platform via demo/quote; separate Vulnerability Intelligence agent plugin service is free) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.cloudpeek.ai/docs/what-is-cloudpeek/ | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://cloudpeek.ai/platform/ | https://hadrian.io/products/nova |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CloudPeek agentic security operations platform and Hadrian Nova?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CloudPeek agentic security operations platform-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response): Not published (platform via demo/quote; separate Vulnerability Intelligence agent plugin service is free) Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing).
Where are CloudPeek agentic security operations platform and Hadrian Nova headquartered?
CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) or Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) alternatives
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform (automatic triage, agent-run investigations and approval-gated response)