Home / Compare / Devin vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation

Devin vs Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation

Quick answer

Devin (Cognition) and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Devin (Cognition) and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation (Mend.io (White Source Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Field	Devin	Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation
Vendor	Cognition	Mend.io (White Source Ltd)
HQ	United States · North America	Israel · Middle East
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Business operations	Code security, Security
Summary	Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product.	AI capabilities in the Mend AppSec platform: Agentic Triage uses an LLM to classify each SAST finding as true positive, false positive or inconclusive with an evidence breakdown and exploitation path, and AI code remediation proposes fixes that can be turned into a pull request from GitHub, the PR check or Jira.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	FedRAMP	—
Capabilities / tasks	agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec	appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	GitHub.com, Azure DevOps Repos, Bitbucket Cloud, Jira, Mend CLI
Pricing (as published)	Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs).	Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29).
Pricing model	published-tiers	published-tiers
Primary source	https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp	https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-29
Official site	https://devin.ai/	https://docs.mend.io/platform/latest/code-findings-triage

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Devin and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation, appsec. Devin-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation-only tasks: sast, vulnerability-management, pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Devin: Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation: Published 'up to' list prices: Mend AppSec up to USD 1,000 per developer/year; Mend AI up to USD 300; Mend Renovate Enterprise up to USD 250 (mend.io/pricing, checked 2026-10-29).

Where are Devin and Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation headquartered?

Devin publishes HQ in United States. Mend.io Agentic Triage and AI code remediation publishes HQ in Israel.

Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)