Conveyor vs Filigran XTM One
Quick answer
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Conveyor |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Conveyor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Business operations | Security |
| Summary | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, trust center | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.conveyor.com/ | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Conveyor and Filigran XTM One?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)
Where are Conveyor and Filigran XTM One headquartered?
Conveyor publishes HQ in United States. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Conveyor or Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Conveyor alternatives
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Conveyor comparisons
- Conveyor vs SafeBase
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Conveyor
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Mondoo
- Conveyor vs Orca Security
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)