Conveyor vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest
Quick answer
Conveyor (Conveyor) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Conveyor (Conveyor) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Conveyor |  SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Conveyor | SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt)) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Germany · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Business operations | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, trust center | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface |
| Pricing (as published) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. | Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing | https://squr.ai/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.conveyor.com/ | https://squr.ai/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Conveyor and SQUR Autonomous Pentest?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, vulnerability-management, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.
Where are Conveyor and SQUR Autonomous Pentest headquartered?
Conveyor publishes HQ in United States. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Conveyor or SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Conveyor alternatives
- SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Conveyor comparisons
- Conveyor vs SafeBase
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Conveyor
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Mondoo
- Conveyor vs Orca Security
More SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)