Corma AI agents vs Filigran XTM One

Print / Save PDF

Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) and Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Columns

Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)

Hide columns to focus the table. The full comparison stays in the HTML.

Field	Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)	Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
Vendor	Corma (Corma SAS)	Filigran (Filigran SAS)
HQ	France · Europe	France · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security
Summary	French identity and SaaS-management product whose custom AI agents automate joiner-mover-leaver provisioning, offboarding and other identity actions in web apps even when no API, SCIM or SAML is available, using a browser-based agent that interprets the admin UI and executes the workflow steps.	Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	ISO 27001, SOC 2	SOC 2, ISO 27001
Capabilities / tasks	identity governance, access reviews, workflow automation, agentic ops	threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection
Pricing (as published)	Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users.	Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)
Pricing model	published-tiers	quote
Primary source	https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation	https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one
Last checked	2026-10-20	2026-10-20
Official site	https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation	https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Corma AI agents and Filigran XTM One?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Corma AI agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, workflow-automation, agentic-ops. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation): Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server)

Where are Corma AI agents and Filigran XTM One headquartered?

Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) publishes HQ in France. Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) or Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

• Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
• Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
• noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

• Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
• Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)

Related

• Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) alternatives
• Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
• Best security AI agents

More Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)

More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons

• 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
• Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
• Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
• Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
• AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)