Cursor Bugbot vs Cycode AI Teammates
Quick answer
Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) (Cycode) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) (Cycode) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Cursor Bugbot |  Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Cycode |
| HQ | United States · North America | Israel · Middle East |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes. | Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, remediation | appsec, vulnerability management, remediation, sast, sca |
| Pricing (as published) | Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. | Not published (the pricing page shows no amounts). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot | https://cycode.com/maestro/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot | https://cycode.com/maestro/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Cursor Bugbot and Cycode AI Teammates?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: pr-review. Cycode AI Teammates-only tasks: vulnerability-management, sast, sca. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents): Not published (the pricing page shows no amounts).
Where are Cursor Bugbot and Cycode AI Teammates headquartered?
Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States. Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) publishes HQ in Israel.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cursor Bugbot or Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Cursor Bugbot alternatives
- Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Cursor Bugbot comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cursor Bugbot
More Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)