Cursor Bugbot vs Semgrep Multimodal
Quick answer
Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Semgrep Multimodal (Semgrep) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Semgrep Multimodal (Semgrep) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Cursor Bugbot |  Semgrep Multimodal |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Anysphere | Semgrep |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes. | Semgrep’s AI layer (successor branding to Semgrep Assistant) for detection, triage, remediation guidance and optional autofix on the Semgrep AppSec Platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, remediation | appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. | Free Edition: no charge for up to 10 contributors, 60 AI credits included, up to 10 private repositories. Teams starts at Code or Supply Chain $30/month/contributor and Secrets $15/month/contributor, with 20 AI credits per developer/month. Enterprise is volume/quote with 50 AI credits per developer/month. Figures from semgrep.dev/pricing at last check. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | freemium |
| Primary source | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot | https://semgrep.dev/products/semgrep-multimodal |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot | https://semgrep.dev/products/semgrep-multimodal |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Cursor Bugbot and Semgrep Multimodal?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pr-review, appsec, remediation. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: none. Semgrep Multimodal-only tasks: sast, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. Semgrep Multimodal: Free Edition: no charge for up to 10 contributors, 60 AI credits included, up to 10 private repositories. Teams starts at Code or Supply Chain $30/month/contributor and Secrets $15/month/contributor, with 20 AI credits per developer/month. Enterprise is volume/quote with 50 AI credits per developer/month. Figures from semgrep.dev/pricing at last check.
Where are Cursor Bugbot and Semgrep Multimodal headquartered?
Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States. Semgrep Multimodal publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cursor Bugbot or Semgrep Multimodal. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Cursor Bugbot comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cursor Bugbot
More Semgrep Multimodal comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Semgrep Multimodal
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Semgrep Multimodal
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Semgrep Multimodal