Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
Quick answer
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | FedRAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Escape and Kiro?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Escape-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations, pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check).
Where are Escape and Kiro headquartered?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)