Home / Compare / Escape vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Escape vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Quick answer

Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)	Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
Vendor	Escape	Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)
HQ	France · Europe	United Kingdom · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps.	London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	SOC 2 (vendor's own certification)
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, pen test management, attack surface	pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality
Pricing (as published)	Quote-based	Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Pricing model	quote	freemium
Primary source	https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/	https://sourcery.ai/security
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://escape.tech/	https://sourcery.ai/security

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Escape and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Escape-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: pr-review, sast, secrets-detection, sca, iac, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.

Where are Escape and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?

Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons

More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons