Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Quick answer
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) (Escape) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Escape | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | France · Europe | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, pen test management, attack surface | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Quote-based | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://escape.tech/blog/introducing-cascade-the-multi-agent-penetration-testing/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://escape.tech/ | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Escape and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Escape-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI-only tasks: sast, sca, secrets-detection, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST): Quote-based Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec): Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
Where are Escape and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI headquartered?
Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) publishes HQ in France. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) publishes HQ in Spain.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) or Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Escape (AI pentesting and DAST) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Escape (AI pentesting and DAST)
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)