Filigran XTM One vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force
Quick answer
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) (Lumos) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) (Filigran (Filigran SAS)) and Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) (Lumos) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) |  Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Filigran (Filigran SAS) | Lumos |
| HQ | France · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Compliance |
| Summary | Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | AI agent built into the Lumos identity governance platform that designs roles, completes access reviews (approve/flag with peer and usage analysis) and investigates identity risk, explaining every decision. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | threat intelligence, pen test management, exposure management, threat detection | identity governance, access reviews, risk assessment |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-19 |
| Official site | https://filigran.io/products/xtm-one | https://www.lumos.com/products/albus |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Filigran XTM One and Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Filigran XTM One-only tasks: threat-intelligence, pen-test-management, exposure-management, threat-detection. Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, risk-assessment. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV): Not published (pre-packaged agents included for OpenCTI/OpenAEV Enterprise Edition customers with a usage quota; advanced XTM One capabilities licensed separately; 30-day trial and free open-source MCP server) Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents): Not published
Where are Filigran XTM One and Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force headquartered?
Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) publishes HQ in France. Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) or Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) alternatives
- Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Filigran XTM One (CTEM AI agents and autonomous attack chaining for OpenCTI and OpenAEV)
More Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force (identity governance agents)