GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
Quick answer
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) (Amazon Web Services) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) is tagged for FedRAMP.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot Autofix |  Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | Amazon Web Services |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security |
| Summary | LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security. | Agent platform with security integrations: AWS's agentic IDE and autonomous agent, with Kiro Powers for Snyk, Aikido, SonarQube and Sonatype scanning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | FedRAMP |
| FedRAMP (Marketplace, listing scope) | — | AWS GovCloud (Kiro in scope) · FedRAMP Authorized · F1603047866 · High · authorized 2016-06-21 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | FedRAMP |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review | agent platform with security integrations, appsec, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. | Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://kiro.dev/powers/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitHub Copilot Autofix and Kiro?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, pr-review. GitHub Copilot Autofix-only tasks: sast, remediation, vulnerability-management. Kiro-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitHub Copilot Autofix: Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations): Published: Free $0 (50 credits); Pro $20/user/month (1,000 credits); Pro+ $40 (2,000 credits); Pro Max $100 (5,000 credits); Power $200; extra credits $0.04 each (kiro.dev/pricing at last check).
Where are GitHub Copilot Autofix and Kiro headquartered?
GitHub Copilot Autofix publishes HQ in United States. Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- GitHub Copilot Autofix alternatives
- Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot Autofix comparisons
- GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
More Kiro (agent platform with security integrations) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Kiro (agent platform with security integrations)