Home / Compare / GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk

GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk

Quick answer

GitHub Copilot Autofix generates suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning (CodeQL) alerts inside GitHub Code Security.

Snyk is a multi-engine AppSec platform whose Agent Fix suggests remediations for Snyk Code findings.

This is not a ranking.

GitHub Copilot Autofix generates suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning (CodeQL) alerts inside GitHub Code Security. Snyk is a multi-engine AppSec platform whose Agent Fix suggests remediations for Snyk Code findings. ZeroPath, Pixee, Endor Labs, HCL AppScan RapidFix, Black Duck Signal, Cycode AI Teammates, Phoenix Purple, Kalpita CodeGuard, Contrast AI SmartFix, StackHawk Wingman, depthfirst, Nullify, AISLE, CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix, Takumi byGMO, Sourcery, Cytix and Amnify are listed alongside them as dedicated AI SAST/autofix, PR-security-review or change-driven pentest products. HCL RapidFix was built in collaboration with Pixee but is a separate HCL-branded product. Compare where findings originate, language/rule coverage, and whether you need GitHub-native scanning or a standalone AppSec platform. This is not a ranking.

Field	GitHub Copilot Autofix	Snyk	ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix)	Pixee (automated triage and fix)	Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)	HCL AppScan RapidFix	Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec)	Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents)	Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security)	Kalpita CodeGuard	Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation)	StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)	depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting)	Nullify autonomous product-security agents (find-to-fix with merge-ready PRs and AI Pentest Agent)	AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents)	CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests)	Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing)	Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)	Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)	Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests)
Vendor	GitHub	Snyk	ZeroPath	Pixee	Endor Labs	HCLSoftware (HCLTech)	Black Duck	Cycode	Phoenix Security	Kalpita Technologies	Contrast Security	StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)	depthfirst (DepthFirst AI, Inc.)	Nullify (Nullify Holdings Pty Ltd)	AISLE (Aisle s.r.o. / Aisle Inc.)	CybeDefend (CybeDefend SAS)	GMO Flatt Security (GMO Flatt Security株式会社)	Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)	Cytix (Cytix Ltd)	Amnify (Amnify GmbH)
HQ	United States · North America	United States · North America	United States · North America	United States · North America	United States · North America	India · India	United States · North America	Israel · Middle East	United Kingdom · Europe	India · India	United States · North America	United States · North America	United States · North America	Australia · Australia and New Zealand	Czech Republic · Europe	France · Europe	Japan · Asia Pacific	United Kingdom · Europe	United Kingdom · Europe	Germany · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Security, Code security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security.	Developer-first application security platform. Snyk Agent Fix validates AI-suggested fixes for Snyk Code findings, and the Evo Agentic AppSec agents (scanning, dependency firewall, security review, remediation and secrets) run Snyk's engines as tools. Several of these agents are still in preview.	AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language.	Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models.	Pre-built AppSec agents that read Endor findings against your source, write SAST fixes or file exceptions, pick safe dependency upgrades and open PRs, and answer malware-exposure and CI/CD posture questions inside your coding agents.	Agentic AI triage and auto-fix for SAST findings in HCL AppScan: an LLM pass reviews each finding's accuracy and severity, filters false positives, and a deterministic codemod framework writes fixes in repos and pull requests.	Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP.	Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform.	UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs.	Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request.	An AI agent that runs as a GitHub Action, takes vulnerabilities found by Contrast's IAST (Assess) and SAST, writes code fixes using runtime context, runs your build and tests, and opens pull requests for developers to review.	Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month.	San Francisco application-security platform whose autonomous AI agents trace business logic and data flows to find exploitable code vulnerabilities, check dependency reachability and secrets, review pull requests with proposed fixes, and run agentic pentests against running applications, re-running each attack after a fix merges to confirm it is closed.	Australian 'autonomous system of agents' for product security that covers code, secrets, API pentesting and exploit validation. It proves findings with reproducible evidence, scores them against the customer's assets, writes merge-ready fix PRs routed to code owners, and runs remediation campaigns through Jira and Slack until merge, with the customer keeping final merge approval.	Prague-headquartered AI code-security platform in which thousands of agents analyse a codebase in parallel for exploitable vulnerabilities, fix agents write patches, and agentic verification builds the repo and runs tests before opening a pull request for human merge. October 2026 added agent-driven proof of exploitability against running web apps and APIs. Cohere signed a letter of intent to acquire AISLE on Oct 15, 2026.	French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge.	Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability.	London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies.	Manchester software-change security platform that risk-scores every code change, automatically approves changes that fall within the customer's own policy and escalates the rest, then sends sandboxed AI pentest agents against high-risk changes and logs every decision and tool call as an audit-ready change record.	German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	SOC 2, ISO 27001	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 (vendor's own certification)	—	ISO 27001 (ISMS certification, vendor claim)	SOC 2 (vendor's own certification)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review	vulnerability management, appsec, remediation, sast, sca, secrets detection	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, sca	appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management	appsec, sast, sca, remediation, vulnerability management	appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management	appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management	appsec, vulnerability management, remediation, sast, sca	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, secrets detection, iac	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review	appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, pr review, remediation, pen test management	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation, vulnerability management, pen test management	sast, sca, remediation, pr review, vulnerability management, appsec	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, remediation, pr review	appsec, sast, remediation, pr review, pen test management, vulnerability management	pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality	pen test management, appsec, risk assessment, workflow automation	appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, iac, pr review, remediation, pen test management, cloud security
Pricing (as published)	Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method.	Published plans on snyk.io/plans (Free / Team / Enterprise style tiers; verify current amounts on the plans page).	Team plan starting from $1,000/month + $60 per developer (unlimited repositories and scans) on zeropath.com/pricing; Enterprise is custom; usage-based credits listed as coming soon; startup discounts up to 50%.	Not published as list prices. Pixee describes outcome-based pricing per 'resolution' (each automated triage or fix action), not per developer; custom quote.	Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing.	Not published	Not published	Not published (the pricing page shows no amounts).	Not published for Phoenix Purple specifically. The Phoenix pricing page lists platform plans (Free; Professional £1,495/month; Enterprise on request) but does not say which plan includes Purple.	Not published (demo request).	Not published	Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.	Not published	Not published. Nullify says it prices on work performed (scoped program and estimated volume), not seats or license tiers.	Not published. Enterprise platform by demo/quote; a no-commitment 'AISLE Snapshot' assessment is offered.	Free open-source Community edition and free trial; Cloud plans billed per developer and project (amounts not published); Enterprise on quote.	Published on flatt.tech/takumi: base fee JPY 70,000/month (excl. tax) including 250 credits shared across diagnosis, auto-fix and AI pentest, 15 Takumi Guard users and Runner minutes; overage JPY 280 per credit; a 30-day AI penetration test offer at JPY 980,000 (excl. tax, through end of 2026).	Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.	Not published	Published credit-based plans (amnify.ai/pricing, checked 2026-10-21): Free €0 (30 credits, 7 days, 1 repo, 1 cloud account); Starter €192/month (200 credits, 10 repos); Team €460/month (500 credits, 50 repos, 3 cloud accounts); Business €880/month; Enterprise on request. Extra credits €1 each. Each review, audit or pentest costs credits; no per-seat fees.
Pricing model	freemium	freemium	published-tiers	quote	freemium	quote	quote	quote	quote	quote	quote	published-tiers	quote	quote	quote	freemium	published-tiers	freemium	quote	freemium
Primary source	https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning	https://snyk.io/plans/	https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix	https://www.pixee.ai/platform	https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows	https://www.hcl-software.com/appscan/products/rapidfix	https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.html	https://cycode.com/maestro/	https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/	https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard	https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html	https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/	https://depthfirst.com/	https://www.nullify.ai/	https://aisle.com/platform/autonomous-remediation	https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix	https://flatt.tech/takumi	https://sourcery.ai/security	https://cytix.io/solutions/agentic-pentesting	https://amnify.ai/
Last checked	2026-10-21	2026-10-20	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-18	2026-10-19	2026-10-19	2026-10-19	2026-10-19	2026-10-20	2026-10-20	2026-10-20	2026-10-21
Official site	https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning	https://snyk.io/	https://zeropath.com/products/sast-autofix	https://www.pixee.ai/platform	https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows	https://www.hcl-software.com/appscan/products/rapidfix	https://www.blackduck.com/signal-ai-appsec.html	https://cycode.com/maestro/	https://phoenix.security/phoenix-purple_ai_code_security/	https://www.kalpitatechnologies.com/products/kalpita-codeguard	https://docs.contrastsecurity.com/en/contrast-ai-smartfix.html	https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/	https://depthfirst.com/	https://www.nullify.ai/	https://aisle.com/	https://www.cybedefend.com/en/cybe-autofix	https://flatt.tech/takumi	https://sourcery.ai/security	https://cytix.io/	https://amnify.ai/

FAQ (from this dataset)

Which frameworks do GitHub Copilot Autofix and Snyk both list? (Frameworks (vendor-stated))

They share no framework tags in this dataset. Framework tags are vendor-stated and indicate relevance, not certification.

Do GitHub Copilot Autofix and Snyk publish pricing?

GitHub Copilot Autofix: Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. Snyk: Published plans on snyk.io/plans (Free / Team / Enterprise style tiers; verify current amounts on the plans page).

Where are GitHub Copilot Autofix and Snyk headquartered?

GitHub Copilot Autofix publishes HQ in United States. Snyk publishes HQ in United States.

What else is listed alongside them?

18 other verified listings appear on this pair page: ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix), Pixee (automated triage and fix), Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation), HCL AppScan RapidFix, Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec), Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents), Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security), Kalpita CodeGuard, Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation), StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents), depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting), Nullify autonomous product-security agents (find-to-fix with merge-ready PRs and AI Pentest Agent), AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents), CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests), Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing), Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans), Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security), Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests). That is a relevance grouping, not a ranking.

Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with GitHub Copilot Autofix or Snyk. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)

More GitHub Copilot Autofix comparisons

More Snyk comparisons

More ZeroPath (AI-native SAST and autofix) comparisons

More Pixee (automated triage and fix) comparisons

More Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) comparisons

More HCL AppScan RapidFix comparisons

More Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) comparisons

More Cycode AI Teammates (Exploitability, Remediation and Change Impact agents) comparisons

More Phoenix Purple (Phoenix Security) comparisons

More Kalpita CodeGuard comparisons

More Contrast AI SmartFix (agentic vulnerability remediation) comparisons

More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons

More depthfirst autonomous security agents (code, supply chain, secrets and agentic pentesting) comparisons

More Nullify autonomous product-security agents (find-to-fix with merge-ready PRs and AI Pentest Agent) comparisons

More AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) comparisons

More CybeDefend Cybe AutoFix (AI code security agent that opens tested fix pull requests) comparisons

More Takumi byGMO security AI agent (AI-SAST/AI-DAST diagnosis, automatic fix pull requests and AI penetration testing) comparisons

More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons