Codacy AI Reviewer vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
Quick answer
Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) and GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) and GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Codacy AI Reviewer |  GitHub Copilot Autofix |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Codacy | GitHub |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes. | LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, sast, code quality, remediation | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review |
| Pricing (as published) | Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. | Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-21 |
| Official site | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Codacy AI Reviewer and GitHub Copilot Autofix?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pr-review, appsec, sast, remediation. Codacy AI Reviewer-only tasks: code-quality. GitHub Copilot Autofix-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Codacy AI Reviewer: Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. GitHub Copilot Autofix: Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method.
Where are Codacy AI Reviewer and GitHub Copilot Autofix headquartered?
Codacy AI Reviewer publishes HQ in Portugal. GitHub Copilot Autofix publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Codacy AI Reviewer or GitHub Copilot Autofix. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Codacy AI Reviewer comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
More GitHub Copilot Autofix comparisons
- GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix