GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning
Quick answer
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
GitHub Copilot Autofix (GitHub) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  GitHub Copilot Autofix |  Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | GitHub | Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security. | London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | SOC 2 (vendor's own certification) |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, remediation, vulnerability management, pr review | pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality |
| Pricing (as published) | Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. | Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial. |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://sourcery.ai/security |
| Last checked | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/concepts/code-scanning/autofix-for-code-scanning | https://sourcery.ai/security |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between GitHub Copilot Autofix and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, pr-review. GitHub Copilot Autofix-only tasks: remediation, vulnerability-management. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: secrets-detection, sca, iac, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
GitHub Copilot Autofix: Included with GitHub Code Security. Public repositories: available at no extra Code Security licence. Private/internal repositories: GitHub Code Security is published at $30 USD per active committer/month on github.com/security/plans. Not a Copilot seat add-on; GitHub docs say no Copilot subscription is required. Agentic autofix (GA 15 Oct 2026) is usage-billed: AI Credits from the Code Security budget plus Actions minutes; requires a Copilot billing method. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Where are GitHub Copilot Autofix and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?
GitHub Copilot Autofix publishes HQ in United States. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with GitHub Copilot Autofix or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- GitHub Copilot Autofix alternatives
- Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More GitHub Copilot Autofix comparisons
- GitHub Copilot Autofix vs Snyk
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs GitHub Copilot Autofix
More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)