Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
Quick answer
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Intruder AI Pentesting (Intruder) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  Intruder AI Pentesting |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Intruder |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United Kingdom · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing). |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://www.intruder.io/platform/ai-pentesting |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Hadrian Nova and Intruder AI Pentesting?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: pen-test-management, appsec. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: attack-surface, exposure-management. Intruder AI Pentesting-only tasks: vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). Intruder AI Pentesting: AI web-app pentests start from $3,500 per test; the scanning platform has a free-forever plan and paid monthly/annual tiers (intruder.io/pricing).
Where are Hadrian Nova and Intruder AI Pentesting headquartered?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands. Intruder AI Pentesting publishes HQ in United Kingdom.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or Intruder AI Pentesting. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) alternatives
- Intruder AI Pentesting alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase
More Intruder AI Pentesting comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Intruder AI Pentesting
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Intruder AI Pentesting