Home / Compare / KELA Digital CTI Analysts vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest

KELA Digital CTI Analysts vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest

Quick answer

KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) (KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)) and SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) (SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts)	SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification)
Vendor	KELA (Kela Research and Strategy Ltd.)	SQUR (SQUR UG (haftungsbeschränkt))
HQ	Israel · Middle East	Germany · Europe
Primary category	Security	Security
Also listed in	Security	Security, Code security
Summary	Always-on agentic threat-intelligence analysts trained on KELA's cybercrime data lake: Alex (enterprises and MSSPs) and Ethan (government and law enforcement) monitor the organisation's threat landscape 24/7, prioritise and proactively surface leaked credentials, targeted threats and threat-actor profiles, answer analyst questions and generate RFIs, working inside existing tools via API, MCP, webhooks and a built-in SOAR.	German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	ISO 27001, SOC 2
Capabilities / tasks	threat intelligence, threat detection, alert triage, case investigation	pen test management, appsec, vulnerability management, attack surface
Integrations (vendor-listed)	REST API, MCP, webhooks, built-in SOAR, Slack, Microsoft Teams, email	Not recorded in this dataset yet
Pricing (as published)	Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29).	Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.
Pricing model	quote	published-tiers
Primary source	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/	https://squr.ai/
Last checked	2026-10-29	2026-10-20
Official site	https://www.kelacyber.com/platform/digital-cti-analysts/	https://squr.ai/

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between KELA Digital CTI Analysts and SQUR Autonomous Pentest?

Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. KELA Digital CTI Analysts-only tasks: threat-intelligence, threat-detection, alert-triage, case-investigation. SQUR Autonomous Pentest-only tasks: pen-test-management, appsec, vulnerability-management, attack-surface. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts): Not published; demo-led, with a free start option on kelacyber.com (checked 2026-10-29). SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification): Published on squr.ai/pricing: Compliance Pentest EUR 1,995 one-time per web app/API (24h, free retest); Professional continuous EUR 995 per app per month; bulk credits EUR 1,495 per pentest for 10+ apps; free attack-surface scan.

Where are KELA Digital CTI Analysts and SQUR Autonomous Pentest headquartered?

KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) publishes HQ in Israel. SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification) publishes HQ in Germany.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with KELA Digital CTI Analysts (Alex and Ethan agentic threat-intelligence analysts) or SQUR Autonomous Pentest (24-hour AI web and API pentesting with exploit verification). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 52 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
Agentic pentesting AI agents — 35 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)