Material Security AI agents vs Opal Paladin
Quick answer
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Material Security | Opal Security |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and Opal Paladin?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. Opal Paladin-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. Opal Paladin: Not published for Paladin.
Where are Material Security AI agents and Opal Paladin headquartered?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. Opal Paladin publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- Opal Paladin alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
More Opal Paladin comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Opal Paladin
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Opal Paladin
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Opal Paladin
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Opal Paladin
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Opal Paladin