Material Security AI agents vs RunSybil Sybil
Quick answer
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) (RunSybil) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |  RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Material Security | RunSybil |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security | pen test management, attack surface, appsec, vulnerability management |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. | Not published |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://www.runsybil.com/solutions/autonomous-penetration-testing |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and RunSybil Sybil?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. RunSybil Sybil-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, appsec, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting): Not published
Where are Material Security AI agents and RunSybil Sybil headquartered?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
More RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs RunSybil Sybil (AI offensive security / autonomous pentesting)