Material Security AI agents vs SafeBase
Quick answer
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and SafeBase (Drata (acquired SafeBase)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) (Material Security) and SafeBase (Drata (acquired SafeBase)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only SafeBase is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) |  SafeBase |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Material Security | Drata (acquired SafeBase) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Compliance, Business operations |
| Summary | Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | Trust Center and AI Questionnaire Assistance for customer security reviews, now part of Drata (SafeBase brand being unified into Drata). |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | phishing triage, email security, remediation, incident response, cloud security | trust center, questionnaire automation |
| Pricing (as published) | Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. | Not verified |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://drata.com/blog/announcing-new-drata-look |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-16 |
| Official site | https://material.security/use-cases/automate-user-report-response | https://drata.com/safebase |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Material Security AI agents and SafeBase?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Material Security AI agents-only tasks: phishing-triage, email-security, remediation, incident-response, cloud-security. SafeBase-only tasks: trust-center, questionnaire-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent): Published: Essentials $4 per user/month and Advanced $6 per user/month (billed annually, plus a fee based on Shared Drive size). Essentials includes the automated agent for user-reported phishing. Advanced adds the agent that investigates, classifies and remediates OAuth grants. ATO Resilience is +$3 per user/month as an add-on or $5 stand-alone. Enterprise is by quote. SafeBase: Not published
Where are Material Security AI agents and SafeBase headquartered?
Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) publishes HQ in United States. SafeBase publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) or SafeBase. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) alternatives
- SafeBase alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Material Security AI agents (user-reported phishing agent and OAuth Remediation Agent)