Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) vs Snyk
Quick answer
Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) and Snyk (Snyk) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) (Maze) and Snyk (Snyk) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Snyk is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) |  Snyk |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Maze | Snyk |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security, Code security |
| Summary | UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. | Developer-first application security platform. Snyk Agent Fix validates AI-suggested fixes for Snyk Code findings, and the Evo Agentic AppSec agents (scanning, dependency firewall, security review, remediation and secrets) run Snyk's engines as tools. Several of these agents are still in preview. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | SOC 2, ISO 27001 |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | cloud security, vulnerability management, remediation, sca, sast | vulnerability management, appsec, remediation, sast, sca, secrets detection |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published. | Published plans on snyk.io/plans (Free / Team / Enterprise style tiers; verify current amounts on the plans page). |
| Pricing model | quote | freemium |
| Primary source | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud | https://snyk.io/plans/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://mazehq.com/platform/cloud | https://snyk.io/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Maze AI Agents and Snyk?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: vulnerability-management, remediation, sca, sast. Maze AI Agents-only tasks: cloud-security. Snyk-only tasks: appsec, secrets-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code): Not published. Snyk: Published plans on snyk.io/plans (Free / Team / Enterprise style tiers; verify current amounts on the plans page).
Where are Maze AI Agents and Snyk headquartered?
Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Snyk publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) or Snyk. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Cloud security (CNAPP) AI agents — 9 listings (Cloud and container security posture, exposure and remediation)
Related
More Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Maze AI Agents (Maze Cloud and Maze Code)