CLEAR Investigate vs TrustCloud TrustLens
Quick answer
CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) and TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) (TrustCloud) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) (Thomson Reuters) and TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) (TrustCloud) are both listed in the Risk category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) is tagged for TX-RAMP.
| Field |  TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) | |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Thomson Reuters | TrustCloud |
| HQ | Canada · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Risk | Risk |
| Also listed in | Risk, Compliance | Risk, Compliance |
| Summary | Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. | Agentic third-party cyber risk assessments that scope each vendor by inherent risk, analyse outside-in ratings, inside-out control evidence and vendor artifacts, and produce cited risk summaries with continuous drift monitoring. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | TX-RAMP | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP (In Process) | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | case investigation, aml, fraud detection, government compliance | vendor risk, risk assessment, questionnaire automation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Not published |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate | https://www.trustcloud.ai/trustlens/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/products/clear-investigate | https://www.trustcloud.ai/trustlens/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CLEAR Investigate and TrustCloud TrustLens?
Both are listed under Risk. They share no task tags in this dataset. CLEAR Investigate-only tasks: case-investigation, aml, fraud-detection, government-compliance. TrustCloud TrustLens-only tasks: vendor-risk, risk-assessment, questionnaire-automation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams): Not published TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments): Not published
Where are CLEAR Investigate and TrustCloud TrustLens headquartered?
CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) publishes HQ in Canada. TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) or TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages. · Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) pair comparison
- Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) — Configurable AI agents in London-based Napier AI's Continuum financial-crime platform. In Client Screening and Transaction Screening, compliance teams build and tailor 'responsible agents' in a no-code sandbox and choose how much autonomy to hand over, from flagging sanctions, PEP and adverse-media matches for review to clearing known patterns automatically before they reach a queue, with every agent action explained and captured in the audit trail. · Napier AI Continuum responsible agents (screening alert triage and auto-clearing) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
- Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) — Agentic AI inside Trulioo's KYB verification workflow from Vancouver-headquartered Trulioo. When registries run out, the UBO Discovery Agent researches filings, disclosures, legal and public records, OSINT and verified third-party databases, reaches registries without API connectivity in real time, reconstructs the beneficial-ownership chain with jurisdiction-specific control logic, cites every finding and reports gaps instead of guessing. · Trulioo UBO Discovery Agent (agentic beneficial-ownership research inside KYB) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AML and transaction-monitoring AI agents — 57 listings (Anti-money-laundering, transaction monitoring and financial-crime investigation)
- TPRM and vendor-risk AI agents — 40 listings (Third-party risk, vendor assessments, security ratings and questionnaire automation)
- US public-sector and FedRAMP AI agents — 25 listings (US government, FedRAMP and public-sector compliance or security operations)
Related
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) alternatives
- TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) alternatives
- Best risk AI agents
More CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) comparisons
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- OneTrust vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams) vs UpGuard
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs CLEAR Investigate (agentic AI investigations for government, risk and fraud teams)
More TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments) comparisons
- ACTICO Compliance Solutions AI agents (KI-Agenten for AML, customer and payment screening) vs TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments)
- AiPrise AI agents (AML Agent, Website Agent and Document Agent) vs TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments)
- BigID (incl. AgentIQ agents) vs TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments)
- Black Kite AI Agent vs TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments)
- Blinqx KYC Agent (Wwft client due diligence and UBO checks for accounting firms) vs TrustCloud TrustLens (agentic third-party risk assessments)