Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents
Quick answer
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage (Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)) and C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) (C1 (ConductorOne, Inc.
d/b/a C1)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
This is not a ranking.
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage (Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.)) and C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) (C1 (ConductorOne, Inc. d/b/a C1)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage |  C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Adaptive Security (TeamGuard AI Inc.) | C1 (ConductorOne, Inc. d/b/a C1) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security, Compliance |
| Summary | API-based 'agentic email security' that re-analyses inbound mail after native filtering with ML and LLM reasoning and removes confirmed threats across every inbox automatically (configurable human-in-the-loop thresholds). AI Phish Triage classifies employee-reported emails and acts on them, feeding Adaptive's simulations and awareness training. | Governed AI agent on C1's identity platform that carries out identity work end to end from a plain-language request (revoking stale admin grants, building access reviews, assembling audit evidence on who reached production, finding orphaned entitlement owners), acting only within the operator's own permissions and logging every action. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | email security, phishing triage, remediation, threat detection | identity governance, access reviews, evidence collection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products) | Not published (two models: SKU-based Platform pricing or usage-based Flex pricing billed in C1 Tokens; amounts by quote). |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security | https://www.c1.ai/news/press-release/c1-launches-c1-autonomous-worker-governed-ai-agent-for-enterprise-identity-work |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.adaptivesecurity.com/email-security | https://www.c1.ai/products/agents |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: remediation. Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage-only tasks: email-security, phishing-triage, threat-detection. C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, evidence-collection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage: Not published (per-seat quote based on employee count and products) C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne): Not published (two models: SKU-based Platform pricing or usage-based Flex pricing billed in C1 Tokens; amounts by quote).
Where are Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage and C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents headquartered?
Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage publishes HQ in United States. C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage or C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- Email security and phishing-response AI agents — 16 listings (Triage of user-reported phishing, autonomous email threat remediation and AI-run phishing simulation)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage alternatives
- C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government)
More C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)