C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) alternative and competitors
Quick answer
Alternatives to C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) are other verified listings that share at least one category, ordered by shared framework tags (a relevance order, not a ranking). Dataset v0.1.27, generated 2026-10-27.
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) is listed under Security.
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) is listed under Security. These 289 agents share at least one category with it, ordered by number of shared framework tags, then category (a relevance order, not a ranking).
All category-sharing alternatives
| Agent | Category | Shared frameworks (vendor-stated) | Pair page | Add |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston-based agentic security platform where swarms of specialised AI agents categorise, investigate and reach a determination on every alert, escalating only what needs a person, with optional managed service (PLAID ELITE). | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs 7AI agentic security platform | |
| Autonomous agent for email security operations that triages user-reported emails, removes related malicious campaign messages across the organisation and replies to reporters; included in Abnormal AI for Government, which is FedRAMP and GovRAMP Moderate authorized. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Abnormal AI Security Mailbox | |
| API-based 'agentic email security' that re-analyses inbound mail after native filtering with ML and LLM reasoning and removes confirmed threats across every inbox automatically (configurable human-in-the-loop thresholds). AI Phish Triage classifies employee-reported emails and acts on them, feeding Adaptive's simulations and awareness training. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage | |
| Belgian autonomous AI pentest: many agents map the app, test attack paths and re-exploit each finding to confirm it, with a same-day audit-grade report. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Aikido Attack AI Pentesting | |
| German continuous security-testing platform with an AI agent that signs in to the customer's application on its own, chooses follow-up checks and documents attack paths, with every tool run evidenced. Findings are grouped into remediation actions with owners, deadlines and Jira sync, and retests confirm fixes. Agentic red-team campaigns (recon, access, lateral and report agents led by human red teamers) are also offered for TIBER-EU and DORA TLPT style testing. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs AIpentix | |
| A Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) Agentic SOC platform with configurable agents for alert triage, enrichment, investigation and remediation under analyst oversight; its government offering is FedRAMP High authorized. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Andesite Human-AI SOC | |
| Intelligence-native agentic SOC layer: ThreatStream Next-Gen and the Anomali Data Lake ship with autonomous triage, scoring and investigation steps, Tier 1/2 triage agents, a stack-ranked decision queue and automated Priority Intelligence Requirement monitoring, with analysts setting how much autonomy the agents get. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Anomali Agentic AI in ThreatStream Next-Gen and the Anomali Data Lake | |
| US SaaS-security product whose Marlin AI engine autonomously correlates posture, identity and threat signals across SaaS and AI apps, opens investigations without a prompt, and delivers expert-guided remediation steps so teams can cut investigation and resolution time. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs AppOmni Marlin AI | |
| Agent-led managed SOC on the Aurora Superintelligence Platform: a 'Swarm of Experts' of oversight, authoritative and process agents runs triage, investigation, response, threat hunting, threat intel and detection engineering, with Arctic Wolf's human experts in the loop for novel cases and critical decisions. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Arctic Wolf Aurora Agentic SOC | |
| Rome security-testing platform that runs SAST, SCA, IaC/secrets, DAST, vulnerability assessment and penetration testing as one pipeline, in which AI agents autonomously chain vulnerabilities and safely run exploits to prove which findings are exploitable, available as SaaS, self-hosted or an air-gapped appliance. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Ares Cyber agentic AI security testing platform | |
| AI coworker on Atomicwork's agentic ITSM/ESM platform that handles access requests end to end: it reviews context, applies policy, routes approvals to the right owners in Slack or Teams, provisions and deprovisions access and enforces just-in-time access, acting without human intervention unless policy requires it. Listed tools include Okta, Azure AD, Google Workspace, JumpCloud and Microsoft Intune. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Atomicwork IGA Agent | |
| Dutch AI SOC agent for Microsoft 365 SMBs that triages, investigates and contains identity alerts across Defender, Sentinel and Entra ID with human sign-off. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Attic IVON | |
| AWS frontier agent (formerly AWS Security Agent) that runs on-demand penetration tests of your applications with tailored multi-step attack scenarios, reproducible proof and ready-to-implement fixes, billed per task-hour. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs AWS Continuum for penetration testing | |
| API-based email security for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace in which AI agents triage threat activity, correlate cross-domain BarracudaONE signals and run real-time, tenant-wide clawback of malicious messages after delivery without SOC intervention, with Bailey AI explaining every verdict and action. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Barracuda Integrated Email Protection agentic threat investigation and clawback | |
| Italian AI-native offensive platform product: Arcangelo continuously maps internal and external attack surfaces, then runs adaptive multi-stage agentic penetration tests that plan and pivot like an attacker, with potentially intrusive exploitation kept human-approved and auditable. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Beelzebub Arcangelo | |
| AI SOC agent inside Blackpoint's managed ITDR service that autonomously contains high-confidence credential attacks on Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace accounts: it suspends the account, forces a password reset, ends active sessions and logs its reasoning, and escalates anything below its confidence threshold to a human SOC analyst. Generally available since July 8, 2026. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Blackpoint AI SOC Agent for ITDR | |
| Agentic cybersecurity platform that deploys, coordinates and governs teams of role-based and tool-specialist AI agents to triage alerts, investigate incidents, run threat-intelligence and threat-hunting work and track vulnerability remediation inside analyst-approved procedures, with every agent action auditable. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Bricklayer AI security agents | |
| Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Cakewalk Agent Cake | |
| Part of Check Point Exposure Management, launched May 28, 2026. AI agents reason like attackers across an organisation's external attack surface, correlating exposures, leaked credentials, CVE and live exploit research with existing protection coverage, then safely prove, pivot on, or discard each finding, so teams get evidence of what is actually exploitable. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Check Point Agentic Exposure Validation | |
| Check Point's API-based, prevention-first email and collaboration security (Harmony Email & Collaboration, formerly Avanan) for Microsoft 365, Gmail, Teams, Slack and file-sharing apps. Check Point says autonomous AI agents investigate threats, correlate activity into campaigns, prioritise incidents and orchestrate remediation. Check Point Infinity Platform for Government (which includes Harmony Email) is FedRAMP Moderate and GovRAMP Authorized at platform level; Check Point Harmony is TX-RAMP Level 2 — none of those registry rows name the AI agents. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Check Point Email Security AI agents | |
| Oslo-built agentic cloud operations platform whose agents find cloud security and compliance issues, investigate across cloud state and IaC, write the Terraform/Bicep fix, validate it with a plan and policy checks and open a pull request, then verify the fix after it lands. The Compliance Remediation Agent works from Prowler, Security Hub, Defender and Checkov findings against CIS, SOC 2, ISO 27001 and NIS2. Autonomy is set by policy. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Cloudgeni cloud agents | |
| UK agentic SOC platform that sits on top of existing SIEM, cloud, endpoint and threat-intelligence tools: it automatically triages every new alert, runs AI-agent follow-up investigations across connected tools, writes the incident summary and can act within per-workflow authority levels (advise, approve, act), including in on-premises or fully air-gapped deployments. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs CloudPeek agentic security operations platform | |
| Predictive attack-path platform whose AI agents correlate digital-risk, attack-surface and threat signals into validated paths, plus AIVigil for exposed AI and agentic workflows. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs CloudSEK AI Agents | |
| German agent that completes incoming security questionnaires (vendor assessments, TISAX, ISO 27001, DORA) in Excel, PDF, Word or vendor portals from the customer's policies, certificates and past answers, with a source citation on every answer, consistent answers to re-worded questions, expert routing and team approval. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Co-Brain Questionnaire Agent | |
| UK offensive-security product that deploys autonomous attack agents starting from the outside with no credentials or source code: specialist agents investigate in parallel, share discoveries on a persistent investigation graph, prove exploitable paths across applications, identities and data, and retest within authorised scope as the environment changes. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents | |
| Autonomous and AI-assisted SOC investigation platform from Austin, Texas. Its LLM agent, Agent Zero, investigates alerts end to end across identity, endpoint, cloud, email and SaaS, auto-closes routine cases with documented reasoning, and escalates the rest with a replayable chain of evidence for analysts to confirm or override. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Command Zero Agent Zero | |
| Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Conveyor | |
| French identity and SaaS-management product whose custom AI agents automate joiner-mover-leaver provisioning, offboarding and other identity actions in web apps even when no API, SCIM or SAML is available, using a browser-based agent that interprets the admin UI and executes the workflow steps. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Corma AI agents | |
| Palo Alto Networks' agentic layer for Cortex: prebuilt and custom security agents that investigate and resolve cloud and SOC issues across Cortex Cloud, XSIAM and XDR, with configurable autonomy and approvals. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Cortex AgentiX | |
| UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs CounterShadow AMI | |
| Self-hosted AI SOC whose agents pick up alerts from SIEM, SOAR and ticketing queues, investigate each one end to end across the customer's own tools, hunt threats and investigate advisories, and only trigger SOAR playbooks once an evidence gate is passed, with a full audit trail for the analyst's decision. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Crogl sovereign AI SOC | |
| Agentic AI analyst for cybersecurity within the CrowdStrike Falcon platform, assisting detection, investigation and response workflows. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs CrowdStrike Charlotte AI | |
| Multi-agent cybersecurity engine across Cyble's threat-intelligence, endpoint and cloud products: agents hunt, correlate IOCs, isolate endpoints, block domains and draft reports, with human-in-the-loop guardrails. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Cyble Blaze AI | |
| Agentic SOC platform that autonomously triages, investigates and responds across the full alert lifecycle, grading every verdict by its evidence and deferring to a human when uncertain. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs D3 Morpheus | |
| Purpose-built agentic AI that autonomously investigates security alerts, tests hypotheses and produces natural-language incident reports for SOC teams. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Darktrace Cyber AI Analyst | |
| AI agent in Datadog Cloud SIEM that autonomously investigates security signals and returns evidence-backed Benign or Suspicious verdicts. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Datadog Bits AI Security Analyst | |
| Berlin security platform whose specialist AI agents triage alerts, assemble investigations, run continuous threat hunts, execute containment and update compliance reporting across connected tools such as CrowdStrike, Splunk, Elastic, SentinelOne, Microsoft Sentinel and Wiz, with autonomy levels, escalation thresholds and approval gates set per agent and per action type. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Decanos AI Agents | |
| Social engineering defense platform where AI agents triage employee-reported phishing, remove malicious mail automatically, tune email detection policies and trace phishing back to its sending infrastructure and links to execute takedowns, alongside brand-impersonation takedowns across web, social, ads and app stores. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Doppel agentic social engineering defense | |
| AI agents for the SOC: an AI SOC Analyst that investigates alerts end to end and shows its reasoning, plus an AI Threat Hunter and AI Threat Intel Analyst. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Dropzone AI SOC Analyst | |
| Autonomous penetration testing built into the Dublin-based Edgescan platform, launched October 7, 2026. A team of narrow AI agents plans, adapts, chains vulnerabilities and validates real impact on web applications, using Edgescan's existing asset context and findings, while a deterministic 'Harness' enforces scope, permissions, approvals and allowed actions. Findings land alongside Edgescan's DAST, PTaaS and ASM results. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Edgescan Atomic | |
| Italian offensive-security platform whose agentic AI hacker continuously maps APIs and applications, chains API interactions to find exploitable flaws, and validates findings for remediation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Equixly Agentic AI Hacker | |
| Portuguese autonomous pentesting platform: the Hackian agentic AI maps the attack surface, runs exploitation routines, chains attack paths and delivers proof-of-exploit with compliance-ready reports. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Ethiack Hackian | |
| Four role-based AI agents (Detect, Triage, Investigate, Respond) on Exaforce's own security data platform, covering detection engineering, tier-3 triage, threat hunting and playbook-driven response with approval gates. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Exaforce Exabots | |
| Agentic AI layer for Filigran's open-source threat-intelligence (OpenCTI) and exposure-validation (OpenAEV) platforms: pre-built agents turn threat intelligence into hunting packages, detection rules and attack scenarios, and an autonomous attack-chaining orchestrator plans, runs and adapts an AI penetration test against an authorized environment, with optional human approval for sensitive actions. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Filigran XTM One | |
| Paris-based agentic pentesting platform in which the Émile orchestrator coordinates 12-60 specialist attack agents (auth bypass, IDOR, injection chains, business logic, privilege escalation) against web apps and APIs, reports only findings proven with a replayable proof of concept, and re-tests fixes, with EU-sovereign hosting. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Fleuret agentic AI pentesting | |
| Cloud-delivered SOC platform (SIEM, SOAR, UEBA, ITDR, threat intelligence and case management in one SaaS) whose agentic AI investigates and correlates alerts across assets and identities, then recommends or executes response actions under analyst oversight. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Fortinet FortiSOC | |
| Netherlands-headquartered continuous threat exposure management (CTEM) platform, KnightGuard, whose Vizier AI layer uses coordinated AI agents (CTI analyst, SOC analyst, red and blue team, ITOps) to monitor the attack surface, turn threat intel into deployable detections, validate them and orchestrate response. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Gambit Cyber Vizier AI and KnightGuard AI agents | |
| AI agent in Google Security Operations that autonomously investigates SIEM alerts and returns a verdict, confidence score, timeline and next steps. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Google Security Operations Triage and Investigation Agent | |
| On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Hadrian Nova | |
| Bengaluru-built AI-native SOC platform in which specialised AI agents correlate and score alerts, run scheduled threat hunts, investigate cases and execute containment and automated response actions across SIEM, EDR/XDR, cloud and SOAR tools, with multi-tenant support for MSSPs. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs HarkX Agentic AI SOC platform | |
| Autonomous pentesting platform that runs unlimited self-directed internal, external, cloud, Kubernetes and AD pentests, plans attack paths, guides remediation and re-tests to verify fixes. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Horizon3.ai NodeZero | |
| Finnish human-risk platform whose Respond module automatically investigates every employee-reported email, groups related reports into one campaign incident, suppresses safe and duplicate reports, and removes confirmed malicious messages from all affected inboxes without waiting for an analyst. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Hoxhunt Respond | |
| Amsterdam-built autonomous SOC platform whose Virtus agents triage every alert through a 7-stage pipeline, return a verdict with confidence and evidence, and hand cases to an investigation agent, with sovereign/on-prem AI options. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Imperum Virtus AI SOC agents | |
| On-demand, code-aware web-app pentesting by AI agents built by Intruder's CREST-certified testers, with audit-ready reports in hours and issue-level 'micro pentests' to triage scanner findings. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Intruder AI Pentesting | |
| API-based email security for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace that runs three AI agents: a Phishing SOC Agent for L2-style forensic investigation of suspicious emails, a Red Teaming Agent that models attacks aimed at your organisation and hardens detection, and a Phishing Simulation Agent. Plans include agentic autonomous remediation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Ironscales AI agents | |
| Human risk management platform whose AI agent reviews user-reported emails, opens investigations and proposes next steps in Incident Responder, with every action held in a human approval queue; the same agent builds and runs phishing simulations and awareness training. Per-user pricing is published. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Keepnet Incident Responder AI agent | |
| Suite of AI agents for human risk management that automatically generate and deliver personalised phishing simulations, training, remedial and policy-quiz content per user; the FedRAMP Moderate KnowBe4 Platform covers AIDA (except AIDA Deepfakes). | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs KnowBe4 AIDA | |
| AI agent built into the Lumos identity governance platform that designs roles, completes access reviews (approve/flag with peer and usage analysis) and investigates identity risk, explaining every decision. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Lumos Albus and Identity Agent Force | |
| Prebuilt AI agents in ManageEngine Endpoint Central that triage EDR events (MITRE ATT&CK mapping, prioritized next steps), investigate device problems and diagnose failed patches, plus Agent Studio for custom endpoint agents. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs ManageEngine Endpoint Central Zia Agents | |
| AI agents inside ManageEngine's Log360 Cloud SIEM: an Investigation Agent that runs multi-stage alert investigations and writes an investigation report, prebuilt Alert Correlation and User Activity Review agents, and a no-code Agent Studio for custom SOC agents. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs ManageEngine Log360 Cloud Zia Agents | |
| Cloud workspace security for Google Workspace and Microsoft 365 with an AI agent that triages, clusters and remediates user-reported phishing across the organisation, plus an OAuth Remediation Agent that investigates third-party app and AI-agent grants and can revoke tokens on its own. Per-user pricing is published. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Material Security AI agents | |
| Agentic SecOps platform whose governed AI agents investigate every alert across the security tools a company already runs, hunt threats, improve detections and trigger authorised response actions, without ingesting data into a new lake; teams set policies, permissions and approval gates. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Mave agentic SecOps | |
| UK AI agents that investigate every cloud and code vulnerability with code-to-cloud context, decide exploitability and deliver fixes. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Maze AI Agents | |
| Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Entra that scans a tenant for users, apps and agent identities not covered by Conditional Access, recommends or updates policies and applies one-click remediation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent | |
| Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Defender that autonomously triages user-reported phishing, resolves false positives and explains each verdict. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Microsoft Security Copilot Phishing Triage Agent | |
| No-code agentic automation platform for SecOps, ITOps and CloudOps: mission-oriented AI agents that reason and act across 4,000+ integrations, with RBAC, approval steps and full audit logs. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Mindflow AI Agents | |
| Agentic vulnerability management that finds, prioritizes, remediates and verifies fixes with policy-as-code and approval gates. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Mondoo | |
| Agentic exposure-operations platform whose AI Exposure Eliminators continuously discover exposures across identity, attack surface, control gaps and vulnerabilities, investigate which attack paths are actually exploitable given existing controls, pick the neutralization path (config hardening, control deployment or patch) for one-click approval, route the work and verify from the sensor that the fix holds. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Nagomi AI Exposure Eliminators | |
| Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs noze CyberAgent | |
| Japanese managed AI SOC service in which NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS's own AI Agent periodically reviews Microsoft Sentinel incidents, correlates endpoint, network and authentication logs and writes an analysis report back, and Sentinel's managed SOAR playbooks then respond to the alerts automatically, with NTT security experts on call. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs NTT DOCOMO BUSINESS WideAngle AI SOC | |
| Zurich-headquartered managed detection and response provider for Microsoft Defender and Sentinel whose ION MXDR service uses a team of AI agents to run autonomous Tier 2-level incident investigations (aggregate telemetry, form and test hypotheses) before handing a step-by-step summary to an Ontinue Cyber Defender. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Ontinue ION MXDR autonomous investigations | |
| AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Opal Paladin | |
| French platform whose agents answer incoming security questionnaires, TISAX catalogues, DDQs and tenders from the customer's own evidence with document, page and version on every answer, score and gap-check the result and draft missing documents with the team before named sign-off, while its Reach product sends questionnaires to suppliers and chases non-responders automatically. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Optivalue.ai questionnaire agents | |
| AI-powered cloud security platform (CNAPP) for agentless workload and cloud posture risk detection. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Orca Security | |
| Continuous external pentesting in which Patrowl's AI agents correlate assets, threats and past evidence, choose the next test step every day, and route every finding through a certified pentester before it reaches you. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Patrowl Agentic AI Penetration Testing | |
| Self-serve automated pentesting from Brno in which an AI agent maps a web app's attack surface, forms hypotheses, chains findings into multi-step attack scenarios (auth bypass, broken access control, exposed secrets) and writes up only what it can demonstrate, with published monthly plans and EU/GDPR data processing. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Penetrify AI penetration testing agent | |
| Security-validation platform that continuously runs automated, production-safe pentests across internal networks, the external attack surface, cloud and identity, web apps and APIs. AI guides attack execution in real time (adapting techniques, generating payloads, chaining exploits) while Pentera's deterministic engine keeps every action controlled and auditable; users can approve or stop execution within guardrails, and Pentera Resolve turns validated findings into automated remediation workflows. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Pentera AI-powered exposure validation | |
| Belgian human-risk platform with a suite of AI agents that run the phishing training programme (orchestration, simulation, brand, supplier and deepfake simulation agents), triage every reported email with a verdict and a drafted reply, and check clicked links in an isolated environment in real time. New content needs admin approval and every action is logged. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Phished AI security agents | |
| Sydney-based cloud and AI security platform with Pleri, an agent that investigates findings, checks real exploitability, raises fix PRs and Jira tickets, and follows each change through to merge. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Plerion Pleri | |
| London-based agentic SOC product: AVA investigates every alert from SIEM/EDR/XDR sources by testing malicious and benign hypotheses against the customer's environment and closes it with a defensible verdict (true positive, false positive or inconclusive with the missing evidence named), producing an audit-ready investigation report for enterprise SOCs and MSSP/MDR teams. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Priam AVA | |
| Agentic AI layer inside Proofpoint's platform. The Satori Abuse Mailbox Agent classifies every user-reported email that needs manual review (phish, malware, spam or clean) and can trigger configured quarantine or tagging workflows. A DLP Triage Agent does the same for data-loss alerts, with guardrails, chat explanations and audit logs. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Proofpoint Satori agents | |
| Agentic AI SOC platform whose agents investigate every alert end to end, respond through scoped Agent Actions autonomously or with sign-off, hunt threats and tune detections. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Prophet AI | |
| Autonomous AI SOC platform that triages, enriches and investigates security alerts across SIEM/XDR, EDR and other tools and returns a documented verdict for analysts. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Qevlar AI | |
| Agent marketplace inside Qualys Enterprise TruRisk Management where teams 'hire' AI agents that detect new exposures without scanning, safely validate exploitability, re-rank risk by active threat campaigns and run confidence-gated patch and patchless remediation with rollback and re-validation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Qualys Cyber Risk Agents in Enterprise TruRisk Management | |
| Seoul security and authentication vendor's agentic AI products: OneSOAR runs security operations from natural-language commands, automates account changes for joiners, movers and leavers, and on detecting anomalous behaviour immediately executes autonomous defence such as account lock, session termination, MFA step-up and admin alerts; OneHacker runs continuous, autonomous AI penetration tests from Pentest-Graph scenarios with white-hacker verification. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs RaonSecure OneSOAR and OneHacker from the ONE AI agentic platform | |
| UK agentic MDR platform on Google Security Operations with specialist AI agents for detection engineering, triage, response and self-healing, under human oversight. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Reliance Cyber RADAR | |
| Agentic AI security operations platform whose six persona-based Agentic Teammates investigate and triage alerts and execute approved containment actions; GreyMatter for Government is FedRAMP Authorized (Moderate). | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs ReliaQuest GreyMatter Agentic Teammates | |
| Offensive-security vendor from Milpitas, California. Its on-premises, model-agnostic RidgeGen agent does agentic AI red teaming: it reasons through multi-step attack chains to find business-logic and non-CVE risks, verifies every finding with reproducible exploit evidence, gives fix guidance and re-runs to confirm fixes. It sits alongside RidgeBot automated pentesting. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Ridge Security RidgeGen and RidgeBot | |
| AI offensive security platform whose agents run black- or white-box autonomous pentests, chain vulnerabilities across code, APIs, cloud and infrastructure, reproduce every finding, and re-test on each deployment. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs RunSybil Sybil | |
| Trust Center and AI Questionnaire Assistance for customer security reviews, now part of Drata (SafeBase brand being unified into Drata). | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs SafeBase | |
| An AI SOC analyst built into the Securonix Unified Defense SIEM that triages, correlates and enriches alerts, writes investigation summaries and prepares cases, coordinated by the Agentic Mesh of specialized agents under human approval. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Securonix Sam, the AI SOC Analyst | |
| Agentic AI SOC analyst inside the Sekoia SOC platform: agents autonomously investigate every alert and case, show their reasoning and produce audit-ready reports for analyst validation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Sekoia Elevate | |
| Agentic AI security analyst in the Singularity platform that runs alert investigations to a verdict and, with Singularity Hyperautomation, triggers response within pre-approved policies; SentinelOne says Purple AI is FedRAMP High authorized. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs SentinelOne Purple AI | |
| An autonomous AI agent for on-demand, ongoing penetration testing that adapts its testing logic in real time and focuses findings on each customer's business context, developed with LRQA's pentesting methodology. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Simbian AI Pentest Agent | |
| Developer-first application security platform. Snyk Agent Fix validates AI-suggested fixes for Snyk Code findings, and the Evo Agentic AppSec agents (scanning, dependency firewall, security review, remediation and secrets) run Snyk's engines as tools. Several of these agents are still in preview. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Snyk | |
| Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs SOCRadar AI Agents | |
| Cloud PAM agent that works with Sonrai's Cloud Permissions Firewall across AWS and GCP. WALLy flags identities carrying privilege risk (overpermissioned roles, external accounts with IAM access, unused permissions), prioritises the fixes that cut the most risk, writes remediation policies (quarantine zombie identities, block third-party access, enforce just-in-time access, remove dangerous privileges) and stages them for a human to review and approve before deployment, then confirms the risk is closed. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Sonrai WALLy | |
| Sophos's managed detection and response service uses in-house AI agents for alert triage and case investigation, with Sophos analysts supervising and owning response decisions. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Sophos MDR AI Agents | |
| Indian-built agentic SOC platform (SIEM, SOAR, UEBA, XDR and threat hunting in one) where AI agents triage and investigate every alert to a conclusion and execute containment inside a customer-defined policy envelope, staging higher-impact actions for a named approver. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Spharaka Sphere | |
| German autonomous pentesting product for web apps and APIs: given a target URL, scope and optional source code, its AI agents carry out real exploitation, a separate agent re-tests every finding against the live app to weed out false positives, and a compliance-ready report with proof-of-exploit and remediation steps arrives within 24 hours; continuous monthly runs mark findings fixed, regressed or new. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs SQUR Autonomous Pentest | |
| Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Strike48 agentic SecOps platform | |
| AI-native email security for Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace in which a multi-LLM reasoning engine (TRACE) investigates each email's intent against your business context and blocks attacks. Three classes of agents give employees plain-English verdicts in Outlook and Gmail, send pre-investigated, MITRE-mapped cases to the SOC, and hunt and remediate across mailboxes. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs StrongestLayer TRACE agents | |
| Email security platform whose AI agents triage user-reported and flagged emails end to end (ASA, with passive or active auto-remediation modes) and write backtested detections for new attacks (ADÉ), which default to one-click human approval and can auto-activate when they clear a precision threshold. Runs as SaaS or self-hosted in AWS, including GovCloud. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Sublime Security ASA and ADÉ | |
| Swimlane's AI SOC product, built on its Turbine automation platform, uses autonomous 'deep agents' to plan and run alert investigations, with explainable decisions, auditable actions and AI-generated plans that analysts can review and turn into playbooks. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Swimlane AI SOC | |
| Synack's Autonomous Red Agent (Sara) for agentic pentesting, with exploitable findings validated by the Synack Red Team. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Synack Sara AI Pentesting | |
| Outcome-driven AI agents inside Sysdig Secure for cloud and container security: Vuln, SOC, Posture, Risk and Response agents that investigate, prioritise and drive remediation on Falco-based runtime data. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Sysdig Agentic AI | |
| Exposure management platform with Tenable Hexa AI agentic orchestration for vulnerability triage and remediation workflows. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Tenable One | |
| Agentic SOC platform where the Socrates orchestrator plans and delegates to specialised HyperAgents for alert triage, investigation and response automation. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Torq AI SOC Platform | |
| Trend Micro's SOC stack (now under the TrendAI brand) pairing an Agentic SIEM and Agentic SOAR with purpose-built agents and the Trend Companion AI assistant. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs TrendAI Vision One Agentic SIEM and Companion | |
| Specialised AI agents inside Upwind's runtime-first cloud security platform: Blue investigates threats to a verdict, Red proves which risks are exploitable, Green finds root-cause fixes and opens PRs, coordinated by Choppy. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Upwind AI Agentic Pack | |
| Agentic pentesting agent for internal security teams and MSSPs. Sable plans and executes authorised tests against web applications, APIs, internal networks and Active Directory, runs real tools, proves impact with reproducible evidence and exploit traces, and supports targeted retests after remediation; teams steer it in plain language and can approve every command or let it run fully autonomously. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Vulnetic Sable | |
| Australian AI SOC agent that enriches, investigates and recommends escalate/close actions on alerts, proposing containment for human approval. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs WedgeX AI SOC Agent | |
| Cloud security / CNAPP platform with agentless visibility, risk prioritization and security graph across cloud environments. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Wiz | |
| Security-questionnaire agent that drafts every answer with a citation from the company's own corpus, routes ungrounded questions to the owning expert, returns the file in its original format, and fills portal-only questionnaires via a Chrome extension. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Wolfia Questionnaire Agent | |
| On-demand pentests of external attack surface run by AI agents shaped by YesWeHack's bug-hunting expertise, with dedicated verification agents, a Pentest Manager, same-day results and reports in its vulnerability-management platform. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs YesWeHack Agentic Pentest | |
| AI-first security operations product launched September 2026. Specialized autonomous AI agents triage alerts, investigate root cause, assign evidence-backed verdicts and trigger response workflows, and Zscaler's inline Zero Trust controls can automatically isolate users, block command-and-control traffic and cut off lateral movement. | Security | — | C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs Zscaler Agentic SOC | |
| Sovereign GRC AI engine that maps controls, finds gaps, drafts assessment responses and creates risks, issues and tasks inside the 6clicks Hub & Spoke platform. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Pre-built Agentforce agents for federal, state and local government, covering complaint management, benefits and licensing, code-violation compliance and internal IT compliance; Salesforce says Agentforce is FedRAMP High authorized in Government Cloud Plus. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Aikido AutoFix turns SAST, SCA, IaC, container, pentest and AI code-audit findings into reviewable pull requests or IDE patches. Vendor is Belgium-founded with a Ghent European HQ. | Code security | — | — | |
| Prague-headquartered AI code-security platform in which thousands of agents analyse a codebase in parallel for exploitable vulnerabilities, fix agents write patches, and agentic verification builds the repo and runs tests before opening a pull request for human merge. October 2026 added agent-driven proof of exploitability against running web apps and APIs. Cohere signed a letter of intent to acquire AISLE on Oct 15, 2026. | Code security | — | — | |
| AI-native GRC platform whose agents monitor controls, collect evidence, map controls, flag gaps, draft security-questionnaire responses and remediate gaps across 40+ frameworks, with a dedicated compliance expert per customer. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Amazon Q Developer code reviews that scan for SAST issues, secrets, IaC misconfigurations, quality issues, deployment risks and SCA, with some in-IDE suggested fixes. | Code security | — | — | |
| German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. | Code security | — | — | |
| Enterprise GRC platform with built-in agents for evidence analysis, control assessment, risk enrichment and findings extraction, plus an Agent Studio for custom GRC agents and agentic TPRM. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Generally available Agent Studio for deploying AI agents inside Appian processes that reason over enterprise data and act under platform guardrails; Appian Government Cloud is FedRAMP High authorized. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Governed GRC agents ('AI Operators') inside the Archer system of record: identity-bound, scope-limited, human-supervised agents for control generation and assurance, regulatory change, reportable-event review and record hygiene; the Archer Evolv product is TX-RAMP Level 2 certified. | Compliance | — | — | |
| German, EU-hosted AI agent in the Athereon GRC platform that identifies risks, captures assets, maps gaps against NIS2/ISO 27001/DORA/TISAX/CRA, and sends and fills security questionnaires, asking for approval before it changes anything. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Multi-agent orchestration for financial-statement audits: an orchestrator staffs engagements with long-running agents that draft disclosure-checklist answers, categorise trial balances, generate PBC request lists, prepare and perform procedures and draft workpapers, all ending in a human sign-off queue. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI agents that close routine Level 1 communications and trade-surveillance alerts on their own, using three-model consensus (any disagreement escalates to a human), with a regulator-ready Bundle Log of every decision. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Data security, privacy and DSPM platform whose AgentIQ agentic layer runs data-risk work from a request: four BigID agents at launch (Remediate Sensitive Data, AI Governance Enforcement, Access Exposure Analysis, Privacy Operations) investigate, prioritise and act, e.g. revoking access, remediating exposure, applying retention, quarantining data and fulfilling data subject requests. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI agents inside the BILL finance platform for small and midsize businesses: the W-9 Agent requests, follows up on, collects and pre-validates vendor W-9s (names and TINs), and the Reconciliation Agent codes and reconciles receipts, with the customer's team approving the final data. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Agentic AI application security tool (GA March 2026) with role- and task-based agents that analyse new code in any language, filter findings by exploitability and apply verified fixes, callable from Claude Code, Gemini and GitHub Copilot via MCP. | Code security | — | — | |
| Third-party cyber risk agent made of sub-agents (Assessment, Incident Response, Threat Actor Intelligence, Investigation, Prioritization, Procurement) that assess vendors, investigate exposures, trigger rescans and draft outreach. | Risk | — | — | |
| Dutch AI agent that runs Wwft client due diligence for accounting and tax firms: it analyses client files, UBO structures and legal constructions, checks identities against PEP and sanctions lists, pulls audit information from the Dutch UBO register and Trade Register, flags profile changes and schedules re-reviews, and delivers audit-ready KYC files with a source reference for every conclusion, while a person makes the decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| Permissions-aware AI agents on Box's content platform: the Box Agent plans multi-step work across files, Extract agents turn documents into structured metadata, a Classification agent labels sensitive content, and Box AI Studio builds custom agents; Box AI sits inside Box's FedRAMP High boundary per the Marketplace listing. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Agent platform for bank and fintech financial-crime operations: pre-built and custom agents gather evidence, apply the institution's policy and draft full cases for EDD, monitoring alerts, sanctions, SAR drafting and KYB, with every action logged. | Risk | — | — | |
| Legal and compliance agents that combine AI document review with BRYTER's rule-based workflow engine to run specific tasks end to end, such as reviewing contracts against DORA, reviewing DPAs and NDAs against a playbook, and generating the amendment agreements or reports. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Audit-engagement agents inside Caseware: the Disclosure Checklist Agent drafts cited Yes/No/N-A checklist responses from financial statements, and the Risk Suggestion Agent drafts engagement-specific risks for auditor review. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AML/KYC agents that resolve L1 and L2 screening alerts (sanctions, PEPs, adverse media) against the institution's own policies, plus transaction-monitoring and fraud-monitoring agents, with a documented rationale for every decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic cyber assurance and continuous compliance platform whose AI agents collect evidence, test controls, find gaps against 50+ frameworks (FISMA, NIST 800-53, FedRAMP, CMMC) and generate ATO artifacts; the platform is FedRAMP High authorized. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Family of agentic AppSec agents on Checkmarx One (Developer Assist in the IDE, plus triage/remediation). Checkmarx Ltd’s registered office is Ramat Gan, Israel. | Code security | — | — | |
| Brazilian GRC-plus-security-operations platform from Central IT: alerts from proxy, DNS, XDR, e-mail and identity tools are correlated and prioritised by AI, AI agents check deadlines, priorities and owners for each compliance or security demand, and AI agents execute checks and response actions in the environment (Cognitive Workflow), with LGPD, ISO 27001, NIST, CIS Controls 8 and ISO 42001 mapped out of the box. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Anthropic automated security review in Claude Code: the /security-review command and the anthropics/claude-code-security-review GitHub Action for pull-request comments. | Code security | — | — | |
| Agentic investigation tool built on Thomson Reuters CLEAR public-records data. From a plain-language question it plans and runs searches across CLEAR data and the open web, resolves conflicting records and returns concise cited findings with a record of the searches it ran, for AML, fraud, program-integrity and law-enforcement investigators. | Risk | — | — | |
| Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes. | Code security | — | — | |
| Open-source-leaning AI compliance software that automates evidence collection, policy generation, and continuous monitoring for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and GDPR. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Enterprise GRC platform with a fleet of task-specific AI agents for evidence review, control advice and remediation, policy drafting, risk treatment planning, vendor questionnaire review and risk scoring, and customer security questionnaires. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Berlin-based AI quality layer for audit firms. Its agents review audit files end to end, cross-checking figures, disclosures and assertions across financial statements, audit reports and working papers, run substantive sample testing against the auditor's criteria and work through IFRS/UK GAAP/Companies Act disclosure checklists, documenting findings for auditor and partner sign-off. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI governance platform for policy packs, model risk and responsible AI compliance including EU AI Act and NIST AI RMF oriented programs. | Compliance | — | — | |
| New Delhi-headquartered third-party risk platform with seven agents marked Live: an outreach agent that autonomously sends and follows up vendor emails and voice reminders and escalates non-response, a questionnaire agent that distributes, chases and analyses vendor questionnaires, plus continuous adverse-media/watchlist monitoring, risk-based scoring, financial analysis, screening and efficiency agents that auto-approve low-risk vendors and trigger re-assessments. | Risk | — | — | |
| Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes. | Code security | — | — | |
| French AI code security platform (SAST, SCA, IaC, container and secret scanning) whose Cybe AutoFix agent reads the code graph, rewrites vulnerable lines or picks the safest dependency upgrade, tests the change in isolation and opens a bot-signed, CI-gated pull request for a human to merge. | Code security | — | — | |
| Cycode's AppSec AI agents that assess the exploitability of findings, generate fixes, analyse change impact and query the risk graph inside the Cycode platform. | Code security | — | — | |
| Cyber GRC platform whose AI agents build and run end-to-end compliance workflows from natural-language prompts, covering evidence collection, control testing, gap analysis and continuous control monitoring. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Manchester software-change security platform that risk-scores every code change, automatically approves changes that fall within the customer's own policy and escalates the rest, then sends sandboxed AI pentest agents against high-risk changes and logs every decision and tool call as an audit-ready change record. | Code security | — | — | |
| India DPDP Act compliance platform run by ten scoped agents for data discovery and RoPA, consent, data principal rights requests, breach response, DPIAs, regulatory intelligence, policy drafting, processor risk and audit evidence, with human approval gates for Board notifications, policy publication and severity downgrades. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI privacy agent built into DataGrail's privacy platform that autofills privacy and AI-risk assessments, classifies cookies, detects AI risk, suggests processing activities and troubleshoots DSR integration errors, acting only with user approval. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic automation platform for audit and finance in which agents run end-to-end procedures over evidence and return traceable workpapers for human review and sign-off. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI teammate for fraud and AML teams on the DataVisor platform. From a plain-language request, Vera orchestrates agents that author detection rules, features and lists, tune strategies against production telemetry, summarise alerts and draft FinCEN-aligned SAR narratives; changes are proposal-only and a human approves before anything reaches production. Vera Code turns requirements into tested, documented configurations. | Risk | — | — | |
| CMMC and NIST SP 800-171 readiness platform for US defence contractors where AI agents interpret obligations, plan and advance routine readiness work, continuously map the CMMC boundary and collect evidence, with human review gates on consequential decisions. | Compliance | — | — | |
| San Francisco application-security platform whose autonomous AI agents trace business logic and data flows to find exploitable code vulnerabilities, check dependency reachability and secrets, review pull requests with proposed fixes, and run agentic pentests against running applications, re-running each attack after a fix merges to confirm it is closed. | Code security | — | — | |
| Specialised AI agents that pre-investigate KYB cases end to end (documents, UBOs, AML screening hits, online reputation), auto-approve routine cases under the customer's policy and escalate edge cases with a full audit trail. | Risk | — | — | |
| Compliance and trust management platform with AI-assisted evidence collection, continuous control monitoring, and multi-framework programs. | Compliance | — | — | |
| European Cyber GRC platform whose AI agent, Jerry, turns NIS2, ISO 27001 and DORA requirements into measures and tasks, assigns them to owners, follows up delays, collects and checks evidence freshness and escalates only what is blocked. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Pre-built AppSec agents that read Endor findings against your source, write SAST fixes or file exceptions, pick safe dependency upgrades and open PRs, and answer malware-exposure and CI/CD posture questions inside your coding agents. | Code security | — | — | |
| A GRC platform built around agents that draft policies, answer inbound security questionnaires, review vendors' SOC 2 and CAIQ responses, map controls, assess risks and write deterministic evidence-collection recipes. Every plan, step-run and sensitive action goes through human approvals and safety floors. Pricing is published. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Offensive security platform using AI agents for attack surface discovery, business-logic DAST and multi-agent pentesting (Cascade) of APIs and web apps. | Code security | — | — | |
| AI agent embedded in Feedzai's RiskOps Studio that analyses fraud rules, retrieves and summarises alert data for investigations, and drafts SAR narratives for investigator review. | Risk | — | — | |
| Governed agentic workforce on Fenergo's client lifecycle (CLM/KYC) platform: agents complete routine KYC steps, resolve routine screening hits, process documents and source client data, with humans approving outcomes. | Risk | — | — | |
| EU-hosted compliance platform for European companies whose agents read documents and GitHub evidence, watch security advisories, flag gaps and propose actions, with per-agent autonomy set to Propose & Wait, Hybrid or Full. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Agent workforce for audit and advisory firms: agents plan engagements, run testing through to workpapers, review conclusions against evidence and draft financial statements, coordinated by Field Orchestrator. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Search and review agents that run the AML screening lifecycle — finding matches, assessing them against the entity profile, and re-checking hits as cases age. | Risk | — | — | |
| Governed AI agent for bank AML alert triage, case investigation and SAR narrative drafting, with analyst confirmation required before any case is closed, escalated or filed. | Risk | — | — | |
| Close-management platform whose Transform AI agents run accounting workflows end to end (reconciliations, journal entries, close tasks); Transform can rebuild a finished close into a governed, documented agent tested against approved numbers, and each agent needs accountant sign-off before it runs. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Evidence-first vendor security assessment where AI agents read SOC 2 reports, ISO certificates, pen tests and questionnaires, validate controls, score risk with cited reasoning, auto-approve low-risk vendors and route high-risk ones to analysts with follow-up questions framed. | Risk | — | — | |
| An 'Agentic OS' of 28 named AI agents in three squads covering fraud, KYC/AML, sanctions screening, STR/SAR drafting, audit trails and model risk for banks, fintechs and insurers. Each agent works in shadow mode first, then within autonomy bands and a per-agent kill switch that the institution sets. | Risk | — | — | |
| Financial-crime platform from Riyadh-based MOZN whose built-in agentic AI triages AML alerts, summarises cases, recommends dispositions, auto-closes low-risk or duplicate cases and drafts SARs, alongside a Fraud Investigation Agent; humans keep consequential decisions. | Risk | — | — | |
| Rotterdam 'digital employee' platform whose KYC agents request, validate and classify customer documents in real time, guide customers through verification by voice or chat, run sanctions, adverse-media and PEP checks before onboarding completes, and close routine KYC checks without manual review, routing exceptions to analysts with pre-extracted data and logging every decision for supervisors. | Risk | — | — | |
| Generally available agentic AML module for banks: a central orchestrator coordinates specialised agents that gather data, analyse transactions and customer behaviour, review prior alerts and deliver a decision-ready Level 1 alert recommendation with documented rationale, with analysts making every final decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| Berlin agentic compliance platform in which six AI agents run recurring ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, TISAX and DORA work on a schedule: planning a first certification, weekly gap audits against connected systems, drafting policies, collecting evidence, drafting security-questionnaire answers and checking vendor contracts and DPAs, with every result logged and approved by a person. | Compliance | — | — | |
| LLM-generated suggested fixes for GitHub code-scanning alerts (CodeQL), plus agentic autofix (generally available 15 Oct 2026), where an alert is assigned to Copilot, which investigates, validates a fix and opens a pull request. Part of GitHub Code Security / Advanced Security. | Code security | — | — | |
| GitLab Duo features that explain SAST vulnerabilities and open merge requests with proposed AI remediations, including an agentic resolution flow. | Code security | — | — | |
| Buenos Aires-headquartered compliance and fraud platform for Latin American fintechs and banks in which 25+ specialised AI agents run KYC/KYB onboarding, sanctions/PEP screening, real-time transaction monitoring, alert triage with an auditable case file, and regulator-format SAR/STR drafting, while a human decides and signs. | Risk | — | — | |
| ITSM/ESM platform (formerly HaloITSM) with AI agents: conversational agents for end users and fulfillers, and process agents (Dispatch, 1st Line Support, Major Incident, Knowledge, Change Management) that act on their own within role-based permissions. The platform, including a FedRAMP/CMMC GRC module, is FedRAMP 20x Moderate. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Agentic AI overlay for AML teams: agents that gather data, summarise cases, flag typologies, draft SAR narratives and triage screening hits, with a human in the loop. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic AI triage and auto-fix for SAST findings in HCL AppScan: an LLM pass reviews each finding's accuracy and severity, filters false positives, and a deterministic codemod framework writes fixes in repos and pull requests. | Code security | — | — | |
| AI agents for financial-crime compliance: a Research Agent that gathers and synthesises subject evidence and a Review Agent that fills out case reviews per your procedures, on an agent orchestration platform with analyst approval. | Risk | — | — | |
| Swedish compliance execution platform for regulated firms that turns a company's own policies into a requirement registry, checks it against DORA, NIS 2, GDPR or customer demands, and hands routine work to agents (contracts checked in batches, evidence collected on schedule, updates computed when a rule changes), with a person approving every result. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Teams of AI agents for finance shared services that capture, code, tax-validate and PO-match invoices, process order confirmations, delivery notes and dunning letters, and post validated results to the ERP with traceable reasoning. | Business operations | — | — | |
| AI-powered GRC platform for program management, evidence, audits and multi-framework compliance. | Compliance | — | — | |
| IBM's agent platform to build, deploy, orchestrate and govern AI agents (IBM, custom and partner agents for HR, procurement and other domains); watsonx Orchestrate for Government is in scope of IBM Data Services for Government, FedRAMP Moderate. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Governed AI agents for KYC/KYB onboarding, credit underwriting, due diligence and DPDP-oriented privacy compliance in regulated finance. | Risk | — | — | |
| India DPDP Act compliance platform where assessment, obligation, consent, notification and evidence agents (plus the Veda AI privacy analyst) run gap assessments, track obligations, draft notices and assemble evidence, with lawyers and the customer approving every gate. | Risk | — | — | |
| CMMC- and NIST 800-171-focused GRC platform whose AI agents auto-map evidence to assessment objectives (Evan) and run automated control gap assessments with remediation steps (Alfie); FedRAMP 20x Low authorized. | Compliance | — | — | |
| German agentic GRC/ISMS platform whose agents import and map existing registers and documents, check them against the method (e.g. BSI IT-Grundschutz), turn gaps into owned tasks, propose risk ratings and controls, assign evidence, prepare audit answers and reassess risks when a record changes, with no change taking effect without human approval. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Indian autonomous DevSecOps agent that scans each commit, generates a secure patch and opens a human-approved pull request. | Code security | — | — | |
| Agent layer behind Ketch's privacy platform that self-populates data maps, runs always-on gap analysis between regulations, your commitments and live systems, and proposes reviewable configuration changes, DPIAs and RoPA exports. | Risk | — | — | |
| Generative-AI agents for financial-services regulatory compliance: a Screening Agent for horizon scanning and alerts, a Gap Analysis Agent that maps rules such as DORA, PSD3 and MiCAR against your policies, and a Reports Agent. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Agentic AI platform, formerly ContractPodAi, that runs contract lifecycle, legal, procurement and finance work end to end, including drafting, redlining, negotiation and obligations. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Legal AI platform with contracting, research and compliance agents, plus an Agent Studio that runs whole legal workflows from intake to approval against the organisation's playbooks. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Vilnius-registered 'agentic compliance' GDPR platform whose AI agents write and keep the Article 30 register current as the business changes, find and assess every processor's DPA against Article 28, prepare DPIAs, draft breach-notification decisions and turn data-subject requests into deadline-tracked case records, routing judgement calls to the privacy team. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic ERP for multi-entity finance teams: executive agents (Bill, Contract, Accrual) do accounting work, audit agents check their output and instructions against written accounting and approval policies, and materiality-based approval controls decide what needs a controller or CFO. | Business operations | — | — | |
| AI GRC platform (Risk Cloud) with GRC Agents that act under human supervision for third-party risk, AI governance, enterprise risk and business continuity. | Risk | — | — | |
| Explainable AI agent for financial-crime investigations that prepares cases, runs triage and supports SAR-oriented workflows while institutions keep governance decisions. | Risk | — | — | |
| Milan AML product in which an AI agent runs Italian 'adeguata verifica' (customer due diligence) end to end: it analyses each onboarding document for relevance and extracts the data, traces beneficial owners through chains of shell companies using private documents and public databases, screens PEP, EU/UN sanctions and internal watchlists, proposes a reasoned risk classification and logs every step in a traceable report; a companion agent analyses transactions to surface real behavioural anomalies and cut false positives. | Risk | — | — | |
| Autonomous financial-oversight platform that analyses 100% of transactions to surface anomalies, control failures and fraud risk for finance and audit teams. | Risk | — | — | |
| French agentic Cyber-GRC operating system whose Ernest engine runs separate planner, collector, adjudicator and writer agents to verify every governance claim (from policies, control owners or vendors) against evidence, connector signals and a cyber knowledge graph, returning sourced verdicts with confidence that are re-checked continuously and accepted or rejected by a human. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Autonomous AI agents for privacy, vendor risk and AI governance: discovery, DSR fulfilment, cross-border transfer checks, assessment autofill and AI-agent posture profiles. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI governance platform whose agents discover AI systems, assess controls against evidence, quantify AI risk in euros and investigate changes on a schedule, while decisions on the record stay with your team. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Packaged DSAR agent that handles intake, jurisdiction deadlines, identity checkpoints, discovery across connected HRIS/CRM/ticketing/file systems, third-party PII redaction and response drafting, with a person approving the release. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI agents inside NICE Actimize's Xceed AI FRAML platform (combined fraud prevention and AML compliance for financial institutions, with an offering for credit unions and community banks). The agents automate alert categorisation and triage, dismiss false positives and summarise cases, and 'Converse and Suggest' agents plus a CoPilot suggest investigative paths in natural language, with analysts in the loop who keep control of decisions. | Risk | — | — | |
| EU-hosted compliance platform where AI agents connected to your systems draft policies, map controls across frameworks, collect evidence daily, flag control drift and draft risk treatments, with every output a draft a human must accept. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Italian on-premise platform whose AI agents read company documents and procedures, map them to NIS2, GDPR, AI Act, CRA and DORA obligations, flag gaps and risks with the source linked, and pre-fill registers, evidence and one remediation plan; a person approves every proposal and each confirmed gap becomes an owned task. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI agent inside the Nuix Neo investigative analytics platform for legal, regulatory, investigations and compliance-monitoring matters: it picks and calls Neo tools on its own to answer plain-language questions across a case, links every answer to source items, tags items and writes findings back to the case, and records each step for audit. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Australian 'autonomous system of agents' for product security that covers code, secrets, API pentesting and exploit validation. It proves findings with reproducible evidence, scores them against the customer's assets, writes merge-ready fix PRs routed to code owners, and runs remediation campaigns through Jira and Slack until merge, with the customer keeping final merge approval. | Code security | — | — | |
| Close-management and accounting platform whose agents turn source records (leases, commission plans, card spend, payables) into subledgers, propose the accounting treatment for approval, build schedules and derive journal entries automatically. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Privacy, GRC and responsible AI governance platform used by large organizations for consent, preference, third-party risk and AI oversight. | Risk | — | — | |
| Free, self-hosted, open-source (AGPL-3.0) agent from India's OnFinance AI for banks, brokers, NBFCs, AMCs, insurers and fintechs. It runs 26 workflows of specialist agents that keep a company's regulatory profile current, probe repositories, infrastructure and vendors for gaps against SEBI, RBI, IRDAI, CERT-In and DPDP controls, and write findings (each citing a specific clause), remediation plans and audit reports into a validated, append-only ledger for human review. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI-powered GRC Intelligence Platform (formerly AuditBoard) with domain-trained agents for audit testing, compliance, third-party risk and AI governance. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Oracle's financial-crime case management with agentic AI that pre-investigates AML, fraud, sanctions and KYC cases unprompted, gathers evidence and entity context, runs adverse-media scans and drafts investigation narratives for human review. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agent layer across the osapiens HUB that runs supplier onboarding, record validation, questionnaire pre-fill, supplier case management and risk-trend analysis for supply-chain due diligence (LkSG, CSDDD, EUDR and more), within customer-set guardrails. | Risk | — | — | |
| Risk-decisioning platform with 30+ orchestrated agents on a shared risk memory, including AML L1 review, sanctions screening dispositions, adverse media, EDD dossier, SAR narrative, fraud L1 review, fraud-network and KYB review agents, where every recommendation is confirmed by a human analyst. | Risk | — | — | |
| Spend-management AI agents that enforce spend policy, collect and match receipts, chase approvals, code transactions for month-end close and handle procurement, travel and payment requests. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Enterprise workflow platform whose AI agents (Coach, Knowledge Buddy, Automate, developer agents and the Blueprint design agent) run on Pega's trusted workflows; Pega Cloud for Government, including these gen AI agents, is FedRAMP High authorized. | Business operations | — | — | |
| UK AI code-security agent platform with reachability-validated scanning, PR scanning, IDE/agent integrations and an agent that writes risk-tiered fix PRs. | Code security | — | — | |
| Security 'harness' that triages SAST/SCA/DAST/secrets findings for exploitability, opens fix pull requests with the analysis attached, works inside coding agents, and builds design-stage threat models. | Code security | — | — | |
| AI privacy agent that runs privacy assessments end to end: it monitors tools like Jira, CLM and procurement for new activity, triggers the right PIA/DPIA/TIA/RoPA, researches risk, populates assessments with evidence and routes approvals. | Risk | — | — | |
| Team of risk-informed AI agents for each stage of the third-party risk lifecycle, covering intake checks, evidence review, issues management and executive reporting, with the customer's team in control. | Risk | — | — | |
| Singapore-based RegASK monitors regulatory change in 160+ markets for life sciences and consumer products companies, and its AI agents assess impact on products and markets, assign follow-up tasks and execute subsequent actions in configurable workflows, with expert review and a recorded outcome for each run. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Continuous controls monitoring platform whose RegML AI agents monitor controls, collect evidence, draft control documentation and trigger remediation for FedRAMP, CMMC and NIST programmes; RegScale CCM is FedRAMP High authorized. | Compliance | — | — | |
| A third-party risk platform run by a coordinated team of AI agents. They discover and classify vendors from identity, procurement and IT systems, collect and analyse vendor documentation and questionnaires against external attack-surface intelligence, chase vendors for missing evidence and remediation, and orchestrate approvals with humans in control. | Risk | — | — | |
| Compliance automation built into Rippling's HR and IT platform, with AI framework setup, evidence collection, in-platform AI remediation, an audit portal and Trust Centers. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Library of prebuilt risk and GRC agents on Salesforce Agentforce inside Riskonnect: risk-register signal, risk builder, regulatory mapping, policy impact and horizon-monitoring agents, plus claims and incident intake/audit agents. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI workforce of five lead agents and 27 specialists that runs third-party risk end to end: vendor outreach, onboarding and questionnaire chasing, document assessment, outside-in breach and score monitoring, regulatory gap analysis and remediation, and regulator-ready reporting, with Manual, Assisted or Autonomous mode set per vendor. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic third-party risk management: a swarm of 100+ specialised agents runs the vendor lifecycle from intake and due diligence through remediation, continuous monitoring and offboarding. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agent-first AI governance platform: a knowledge graph of AI risks, controls and policies, an Agent Catalogue, and MCP servers that let customers' agents draft risk assessments. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Fraud and AML platform with named agents that disposition screening alerts, run enhanced due diligence and business verification, analyse networks, draft SAR narratives, tune monitoring rules and build dispute packages. | Risk | — | — | |
| Compliance and risk automation platform popular with startups and mid-market teams for continuous control monitoring and multi-framework programs. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI-powered security and compliance platform combining agentic GRC automation with optional in-house GRC expert consulting bundles. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Compliance automation platform with Comply AI features for policies, remediation, risk, questionnaires and TPRM, plus Trust Center and CMMC/Defense packages. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Third-party cyber risk platform with security ratings and TITAN AI agents running TPRM intake, assessment, monitoring and remediation. | Risk | — | — | |
| Semgrep’s AI layer (successor branding to Semgrep Assistant) for detection, triage, remediation guidance and optional autofix on the Semgrep AppSec Platform. | Code security | — | — | |
| Agentic fraud and AML (FRAML) transaction monitoring in which governed AI agents score transactions, triage and investigate alerts and draft regulator-format SAR/STR reports, with the MLRO approving every filing. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI agent for enhanced due diligence (EDD) on high-risk customers: it gathers internal and external data, unifies KYC/KYB data, sanctions, adverse media and ownership/associate risk, flags risk factors and mitigants, recommends next steps and drafts a fully cited risk narrative for regulatory review, while the analyst makes the final decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic KYC operations layer that validates, auto-cures and submits CKYCRR 2.0 records to CERSAI, plus broader AI-powered KYC, KYB and AML screening. | Risk | — | — | |
| Policy-bound AI agents that adjudicate sanctions, PEP, adverse-media, transaction-monitoring, CDD, trade and fraud alerts on top of a bank's existing screening and monitoring systems. | Risk | — | — | |
| Sonar LLM-generated fix suggestions for a documented subset of SonarQube issues, in Cloud Team/Enterprise and Server Enterprise/Data Center editions. | Code security | — | — | |
| Agentic AI product from Sopra Steria's German company for anti-financial-crime teams: it takes transaction-monitoring alerts and runs the first-level investigation itself (gathering case information from approved sources, analysing facts and patterns in the alert's context, documenting results, sources and reasoning) and prepares a recommended action, while the final case decision stays with the analyst. | Risk | — | — | |
| London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies. | Code security | — | — | |
| Compliance platform for onboarding, monitoring and case work where AI agents run sanctions, PEP, adverse-media and alert investigations, resolve ownership (UBO) gaps and review documents, returning a cited verdict and recommended action for an analyst to decide. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI analyst agents for financial-crime compliance that run KYC and KYB onboarding reviews, disposition sanctions, PEP and adverse-media alerts, perform enhanced due diligence and rescreenings, and draft SAR/UAR filings with audit-ready decision logs. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI agents in SpotDraft's contract platform for contract review, contract queries, clause drafting and regulatory tracking, plus VerifAI playbook review inside Microsoft Word. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Autonomous Trust Platform with governed AI agents that detect change across systems, vendors, access and AI use, then refresh evidence, run vendor due diligence, prepare audits and close control gaps, with humans approving material decisions. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. | Code security | — | — | |
| Generally available since Oct 14, 2026: an agentic operating system for German tax-advisory firms (Steuerkanzleien). AI agents work on the firm's DATEV data in the background. They check client bookkeeping for missing receipts, unusual costs and missing tax codes, flag missing year-end closing entries, calculate BWA metrics and email clients to request missing documents, and changes go back to DATEV only after the firm approves them. | Business operations | — | — | |
| Compliance platform with published product pricing pages for building and maintaining security certification programs. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Persona-based GRC agents in the SureCloud platform that run continuous risk, compliance, third-party and audit work on schedule or trigger, chaining reusable no-code Skills, with human approval gates and separate logging of AI and human actions. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Financial-crime agents on SymphonyAI's agent-native Symphony Risk Intelligence platform: manager and specialist agents that prepare TM and screening investigations, enrich watchlist records, track threat and regulatory intelligence, and run KYC/EDD workflows. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic decision platform for banks and insurers with a library of pre-built agents, including Adverse Media Investigation, Business Ownership Intelligence and Sanctions and Watchlist Match Review agents, that run inside decision flows with human review. | Risk | — | — | |
| Japanese security AI agent that continuously finds vulnerabilities with AI-SAST and AI-DAST (including logic, authentication and authorisation flaws), generates fix patches and opens pull requests with unit tests, and runs AI penetration tests that actually attempt intrusion to prove exploitability. | Code security | — | — | |
| A coordinated team of AML-trained AI agents that runs enhanced due-diligence and KYB investigations in minutes: registry and web collection, officer/UBO screening, adverse-media analysis and transparent red/amber/green risk grading, with analysts keeping the final decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| AML investigation suite inside ThetaRay's Investigation Center, working on top of ThetaRay's transaction monitoring. Ray analyses each alert end to end (case data, customer and counterparty behaviour, KYC/profile alignment, jurisdictions, related past alerts), produces a full investigation report with a narrative, explained decision and recommended next steps, and gives analysts an on-demand assistant; analysts make the final decision. | Risk | — | — | |
| Compliance platform that combines software with audit delivery pathways for SOC 2 and related frameworks. | Compliance | — | — | |
| APAC AML and fraud platform that combines community typologies with purpose-built AI agents for detection, screening, customer risk and investigation. | Risk | — | — | |
| Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Data privacy infrastructure for DSRs, consent and data governance, plus Transcend Rails policy-as-code controls for what AI agents may do. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Agentic third-party cyber risk assessments that scope each vendor by inherent risk, analyse outside-in ratings, inside-out control evidence and vendor artifacts, and produce cited risk summaries with continuous drift monitoring. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI GRC platform whose agents collect and map evidence, test controls continuously, assess policies against frameworks, run natural-language 'TI Playbooks' and answer security questionnaires. | Compliance | — | — | |
| AI agents that run fraud and AML alert triage and investigations: they pull transaction history, check watchlists, run open-source research, assemble evidence, draft narratives and recommend dispositions for analyst approval. | Risk | — | — | |
| Cyber risk and third-party risk management platform with published CRPM pricing page. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agents for bank and credit-union compliance teams on Uptiq's Qore platform. A Sanctions Screening Agent screens every transaction and party and prioritises alerts by risk, a BSA/AML Agent assembles case files and drafts SAR and CTR narratives for disposition, and a Regulatory Reporting Agent prepares and validates filings and tracks regulatory changes to policy; agents run under the institution's own policies, permissions and approval gates, with every action logged. | Risk | — | — | |
| Brazilian risk and compliance decisioning platform whose AI agents read the full KYC/KYB dossier, compare it with current regulation, flag risks such as adverse-media homonyms, and suggest a justified decision with a confidence level for the analyst to validate, with continuous re-analysis when a monitored person or company changes. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic trust and compliance automation platform for continuous evidence collection, control monitoring, policies, and security questionnaire responses. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Privacy-operations agents on Veeam's DataAI Command Platform: a generally available Consent Agent that builds, tests, monitors and auto-remediates consent across sites and downstream systems, plus announced DSR intake-form and assessment-autofill agents. | Risk | — | — | |
| Veracode’s AI-assisted remediation for SAST flaws and SCA dependency vulnerabilities, with suggested patches in IDE, CLI and SCM workflows. | Code security | — | — | |
| Singapore-headquartered agentic compliance platform whose named agents review uploaded evidence against framework controls and flag gaps, score vendors from 12+ external sources without questionnaires, scan cloud posture and auto-escalate critical findings to the risk register, draft answers to customer security questionnaires (SIG, CAIQ, custom) from live policies, draft policies, and generate fixes for failed controls and mark them ready for re-audit. | Compliance | — | — | |
| TPRM agent that launches due diligence as soon as a vendor is added, requests and renews SOC 2, ISO and pen-test artifacts, sends focused follow-ups, monitors breach advisories and drafts impact reports, escalating only exceptions to the team. | Risk | — | — | |
| Pre-trained AI agents for AML, KYB/KYC and financial crime that take on Level 1 analyst work: sanctions and PEP alert reviews, adverse media monitoring, corporate registry and UBO analysis, and narrative report writing. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI agent for US government knowledge workers, grounded in a large corpus of federal and state statutes, regulations, court cases and fiscal data. It runs 50-state research in parallel with citations, monitors legal changes, reviews permit applications against the code, drafts memos and comment responses, and builds internal tools inside the agency boundary. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Agentic vendor-assessment workflow in which four agents (Initiator, Collector, Analyst, Reporter) start assessments, gather evidence, produce cited findings and route an executive summary for human approval. | Risk | — | — | |
| Named AI agents that act as L1/L2 AML analysts: they review and disposition sanctions, PEP and watchlist alerts, transaction screening and monitoring alerts, adverse media, EDD and KYC work, escalating or closing cases with justification. | Risk | — | — | |
| No-code agent builder and prebuilt agents on Workiva's reporting, audit and GRC platform, used for finance tie-outs and roll-forwards and for evidence collection, control testing and remediation, with configurable review and approval steps. | Compliance | — | — | |
| French AI agent for accounting firms' anti-money-laundering (LCB-FT) client onboarding: from a SIREN it pulls the company and directors from the national business register, sends the client a secure portal link and chases missing documents, checks beneficial owners against the RBE register, asset-freeze lists, FATF/EU country risk and document consistency, screens for PEPs, and assembles a traced due-diligence file for the firm to decide. | Risk | — | — | |
| Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. | Code security | — | — | |
| Agentic AI platform for enterprise GRC that executes third-party risk, controls testing, evidence collection, questionnaires and gap analyses with explainability. | Compliance | — | — | |
| Ten specialised AML investigation agents that screen, research, analyse and validate each onboarding or transaction alert, write a cited case narrative and hand the decision to a human analyst; a Red Team Agent challenges every finding. | Risk | — | — | |
| AI-native AppSec platform that finds business-logic and auth flaws, validates findings from existing SAST tools, runs PR security reviews and generates one-click patches refined in natural language. | Code security | — | — | |
| Bengaluru-built fraud, AML and KYC/KYB platform where AI agents run investigation SOPs case by case and draft cited verdicts for analysts to decide. | Risk | — | — |