C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents vs noze CyberAgent
Quick answer
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) (C1 (ConductorOne, Inc.
d/b/a C1)) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
This is not a ranking.
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) (C1 (ConductorOne, Inc. d/b/a C1)) and noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) (noze (noze S.r.l.)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) |  noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | C1 (ConductorOne, Inc. d/b/a C1) | noze (noze S.r.l.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | Italy · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance | Security, Compliance |
| Summary | Governed AI agent on C1's identity platform that carries out identity work end to end from a plain-language request (revoking stale admin grants, building access reviews, assembling audit evidence on who reached production, finding orphaned entitlement owners), acting only within the operator's own permissions and logging every action. | Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | NIS2, DORA, ISO 27001 |
| Capabilities / tasks | identity governance, access reviews, evidence collection, remediation | attack surface, vulnerability management, pen test management, risk prioritization, evidence collection |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published (two models: SKU-based Platform pricing or usage-based Flex pricing billed in C1 Tokens; amounts by quote). | From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.c1.ai/news/press-release/c1-launches-c1-autonomous-worker-governed-ai-agent-for-enterprise-identity-work | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-21 |
| Official site | https://www.c1.ai/products/agents | https://www.noze.it/en/products/cyberagent/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents and noze CyberAgent?
Both are listed under Security. Shared tasks: evidence-collection. C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, remediation. noze CyberAgent-only tasks: attack-surface, vulnerability-management, pen-test-management, risk-prioritization. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne): Not published (two models: SKU-based Platform pricing or usage-based Flex pricing billed in C1 Tokens; amounts by quote). noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence): From €99/month (Starter); Business and Enterprise tiers differ by monitored assets, scan frequency and included automated pentesting; optional pay-per-scan (noze.it product page, checked 2026-10-21). Higher-tier prices not published.
Where are C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents and noze CyberAgent headquartered?
C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) publishes HQ in United States. noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) publishes HQ in Italy.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) or noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) alternatives
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs C1 Autonomous Worker and C1 Agents (identity governance AI agent, formerly ConductorOne)
More noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence)