Codacy AI Reviewer vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
Quick answer
Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Codacy AI Reviewer (Codacy) and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) (Xygeni Security) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Codacy AI Reviewer |  Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Codacy | Xygeni Security |
| HQ | Portugal · Europe | Spain · Europe |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Hybrid AI pull-request reviewer from Codacy (Lisbon). Combines static analysis with LLM context; vendor pages include security-vulnerability feedback and suggested fixes. | Agentic AppSec from Valladolid-based Xygeni: DevAI scans code in the IDE and generates validated fixes (including for AI-generated code), while CoreAI prioritises risk and orchestrates remediation PRs across the platform. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pr review, appsec, sast, code quality, remediation | appsec, sast, sca, secrets detection, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. | Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page). |
| Pricing model | freemium | freemium |
| Primary source | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.codacy.com/ai-reviewer | https://xygeni.io/dev-ai |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Codacy AI Reviewer and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, sast, remediation. Codacy AI Reviewer-only tasks: pr-review, code-quality. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI-only tasks: sca, secrets-detection. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Codacy AI Reviewer: Developer IDE plugin is $0. Team plan, which includes AI Reviewer, starts at $18 per developer/month billed annually ($21 monthly) on codacy.com/pricing. Business is custom. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec): Free plan listed on xygeni.io/pricing; paid annual plans are priced by number of contributors and daily scans (amounts load dynamically and were not captured from the static page).
Where are Codacy AI Reviewer and Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI headquartered?
Codacy AI Reviewer publishes HQ in Portugal. Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) publishes HQ in Spain.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Codacy AI Reviewer or Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
- Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Codacy AI Reviewer alternatives
- Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Codacy AI Reviewer comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Codacy AI Reviewer
More Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Xygeni DevAI and CoreAI (agentic AppSec)