CodeWall autonomous attack agents vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
Quick answer
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent (Microsoft) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) (CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd)) and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent (Microsoft) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) |  Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CodeWall (CodeWall Ltd) | Microsoft |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK offensive-security product that deploys autonomous attack agents starting from the outside with no credentials or source code: specialist agents investigate in parallel, share discoveries on a persistent investigation graph, prove exploitable paths across applications, identities and data, and retest within authorised scope as the environment changes. | Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Entra that scans a tenant for users, apps and agent identities not covered by Conditional Access, recommends or updates policies and applies one-click remediation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | identity governance, policy management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Entra ID P1 or higher plus Security Copilot security compute units (Microsoft Learn says a run averages under one SCU); Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://codewall.ai/ | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/security-copilot/conditional-access-agent-optimization |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://codewall.ai/ | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/security-copilot/conditional-access-agent-optimization |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CodeWall autonomous attack agents-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent-only tasks: identity-governance, policy-management, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing): Not published Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent: No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Entra ID P1 or higher plus Security Copilot security compute units (Microsoft Learn says a run averages under one SCU); Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates.
Where are CodeWall autonomous attack agents and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent headquartered?
CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) or Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) alternatives
- Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CodeWall autonomous attack agents (continuous external adversarial testing)
More Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent