Devin vs Cursor Bugbot
Quick answer
Devin (Cognition) and Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Devin (Cognition) and Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cognition | Anysphere |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Business operations | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Cognition’s autonomous coding agent. Listed here only for documented Snyk MCP/CLI scanning and SonarQube/Snyk/Checkmarx IDE plugins — not as a dedicated security product. | Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | FedRAMP | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | agent platform with security integrations, remediation, appsec | pr review, appsec, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). | Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://docs.devin.ai/work-with-devin/mcp | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://devin.ai/ | https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Devin and Cursor Bugbot?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: remediation, appsec. Devin-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: pr-review. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Devin: Self-serve plans on devin.ai/pricing: Free $0; Pro $20/month; Max $200/month; Teams $80/month minimum plus $40/month per full seat; Enterprise custom (ACUs). Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.
Where are Devin and Cursor Bugbot headquartered?
Devin publishes HQ in United States. Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
More Devin comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Devin
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Devin
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Devin
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Devin
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Devin
More Cursor Bugbot comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cursor Bugbot
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cursor Bugbot
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cursor Bugbot
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cursor Bugbot