Conveyor vs Corma AI agents
Quick answer
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Conveyor (Conveyor) and Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) (Corma (Corma SAS)) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Conveyor is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001.
| Field |  Conveyor |  Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Conveyor | Corma (Corma SAS) |
| HQ | United States · North America | France · Europe |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Compliance, Business operations | Security |
| Summary | Customer trust platform with ConveyorAI for answering security questionnaires and sharing trust center content. | French identity and SaaS-management product whose custom AI agents automate joiner-mover-leaver provisioning, offboarding and other identity actions in web apps even when no API, SCIM or SAML is available, using a browser-based agent that interprets the admin UI and executes the workflow steps. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | ISO 27001, SOC 2 |
| Capabilities / tasks | questionnaire automation, trust center | identity governance, access reviews, workflow automation, agentic ops |
| Pricing (as published) | Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. | Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.conveyor.com/pricing | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
| Last checked | 2026-10-15 | 2026-10-20 |
| Official site | https://www.conveyor.com/ | https://www.corma.io/platform/ai-agent-automation |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Conveyor and Corma AI agents?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Conveyor-only tasks: questionnaire-automation, trust-center. Corma AI agents-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews, workflow-automation, agentic-ops. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Conveyor: Published outcome-based pricing on conveyor.com/pricing. Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation): Published on corma.io/pricing: Freemium (free tier); Essential from €3/user/month; Pro (demo); Enterprise custom from 1,000 users.
Where are Conveyor and Corma AI agents headquartered?
Conveyor publishes HQ in United States. Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) publishes HQ in France.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Conveyor or Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- trail Governance Agents (GRC and AI governance agents) — Munich-based trail's Governance Agents run GRC busywork in the background: they read your project files and sources to collect and link evidence, assess controls, classify systems, run risk and vendor assessments and draft policies, proposing changes that a human approves before anything is written.
Use-case comparisons
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
- Security questionnaire AI agents — 10 listings (Inbound security questionnaires, SIG/CAIQ-style responses and questionnaire automation)
Related
- Conveyor alternatives
- Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More Conveyor comparisons
- Conveyor vs SafeBase
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Conveyor
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Mondoo
- Conveyor vs Orca Security
More Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation) comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Corma AI agents (browser-based identity lifecycle, provisioning and access automation)