CounterShadow AMI vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
Quick answer
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent (Microsoft) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response (CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd)) and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent (Microsoft) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | CounterShadow (CounterShadow Ltd) | Microsoft |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security | Security |
| Summary | UK autonomous SOC product: AMI plans and runs investigation of every SIEM/EDR alert across connected tools without playbooks, returns a true/false-positive verdict with severity and logged evidence in about eight minutes, and can isolate hosts, block IPs or disable accounts under approvals the customer configures. | Security Copilot agent in Microsoft Entra that scans a tenant for users, apps and agent identities not covered by Conditional Access, recommends or updates policies and applies one-click remediation. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | security operations, alert triage, case investigation, incident response | identity governance, policy management, remediation |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Entra ID P1 or higher plus Security Copilot security compute units (Microsoft Learn says a run averages under one SCU); Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates. |
| Pricing model | quote | quote |
| Primary source | https://countershadow.com/ | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/security-copilot/conditional-access-agent-optimization |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://countershadow.com/ | https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/security-copilot/conditional-access-agent-optimization |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between CounterShadow AMI and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. CounterShadow AMI-only tasks: security-operations, alert-triage, case-investigation, incident-response. Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent-only tasks: identity-governance, policy-management, remediation. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response: Not published Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent: No standalone price. Requires Microsoft Entra ID P1 or higher plus Security Copilot security compute units (Microsoft Learn says a run averages under one SCU); Microsoft says Security Copilot agents are also made available to Microsoft 365 E5 customers. Check Microsoft's Security Copilot pricing for SCU rates.
Where are CounterShadow AMI and Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent headquartered?
CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response publishes HQ in United Kingdom. Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response or Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) — Roster of specialist agents inside the SOCRadar threat-intelligence platform: customers deploy agents, set each one's skills, scope and access, and green-light sensitive steps. Agents cover threat-actor and ransomware intelligence, detection-rule writing, IoC enrichment, identity/credential exposure, vulnerability analysis, brand and dark-web monitoring, phishing-domain hunting, external attack surface and Shodan recon, and alarm triage that records verdicts and asks before changing an alarm's status. · SOCRadar AI Agents (specialist threat-intelligence, attack-surface, digital-risk and alarm-triage agents) pair comparison
- Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) — Agentic orchestration platform for SOC and IT teams from the company behind the Devo log platform: purpose-built micro agents triage and investigate alerts, analyse phishing, hunt threats, write and tune detections and help with compliance over logs queried in place across SIEMs and data lakes, with configurable human approval and an audit trail; available as SaaS, isolated compute or an air-gapped on-prem appliance. · Strike48 agentic SecOps platform (pre-built SOC agent team and no-code agent builder over federated logs, cloud or air-gapped on-prem) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- AI SOC and security-analyst agents — 51 listings (Security operations, alert investigation and threat detection)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
- CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response alternatives
- Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent alternatives
- Best security AI agents
More CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs CounterShadow AMI (Autonomous Machine Intelligence) – autonomous SOC triage, investigation and response
More Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Microsoft Entra Conditional Access Optimization Agent