Home / Compare / Cursor Bugbot vs Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents)

Cursor Bugbot vs Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents)

Quick answer

Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents) (Legit Security (Legit Security Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents) (Legit Security (Legit Security Ltd)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.

Field	Cursor Bugbot	Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents)
Vendor	Anysphere	Legit Security (Legit Security Ltd)
HQ	United States · North America	Israel · Middle East
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.	Remediation agents in Legit's Agentic AppSec platform that prioritise SAST and SCA findings using reachability, exploitability and business context, write root-cause fixes (including dependency upgrades), re-scan to validate them and open pull requests across every affected repository for developers to review.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	—
Capabilities / tasks	pr review, appsec, remediation	appsec, remediation, sast, sca, vulnerability management
Integrations (vendor-listed)	Not recorded in this dataset yet	GitHub / SCM pull requests, third-party AppSec scanners (ingested findings)
Pricing (as published)	Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.	Not published; demo-led (Legit Security site, checked 2026-10-29).
Pricing model	published-tiers	quote
Primary source	https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot	https://www.legitsecurity.com/platform/agentic-remediation
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-29
Official site	https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot	https://www.legitsecurity.com/platform/agentic-remediation

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Cursor Bugbot and Legit Security Agentic Remediation?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: pr-review. Legit Security Agentic Remediation-only tasks: sast, sca, vulnerability-management. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents): Not published; demo-led (Legit Security site, checked 2026-10-29).

Where are Cursor Bugbot and Legit Security Agentic Remediation headquartered?

Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States. Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents) publishes HQ in Israel.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cursor Bugbot or Legit Security Agentic Remediation (SAST and SCA remediation agents). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison
Covasant TPRM (agentic third-party risk management) — Third-party risk product from Hyderabad-headquartered Covasant. Purpose-built AI agents onboard vendors through due-diligence workflows, chase vendors who are slow to respond, keep watching news, sanctions and financial data, and, when risk thresholds break, open remediation workflows, track vendor responses, escalate unresolved issues and produce DORA, SOX and NIST reporting packages.

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 37 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)