Home / Compare / Cursor Bugbot vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Cursor Bugbot vs Sourcery AI code review and security scanning

Quick answer

Cursor Bugbot (Anysphere) and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) (Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.

They share no framework tags in our dataset.

This is not a ranking.

Field	Cursor Bugbot	Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans)
Vendor	Anysphere	Sourcery (Sourcery.AI Limited)
HQ	United States · North America	United Kingdom · Europe
Primary category	Code security	Code security
Also listed in	Code security, Security	Code security, Security
Summary	Cursor’s AI pull-request reviewer. Official docs say it identifies bugs, security issues and code-quality problems and comments with explanations and suggested fixes.	London AI code reviewer for GitHub and GitLab that reviews every pull request within minutes, flags security issues and suggests commit-ready fixes, fails the check on high-severity security findings so merging can be blocked, auto-approves low-risk PRs with no blocking findings, and scans whole repositories every night for vulnerable code, exposed secrets, misconfigured infrastructure and vulnerable dependencies.
Frameworks (vendor-stated)	—	—
Frameworks (vendor-claimed)	—	SOC 2 (vendor's own certification)
Capabilities / tasks	pr review, appsec, remediation	pr review, appsec, sast, secrets detection, sca, iac, code quality
Pricing (as published)	Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team.	Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.
Pricing model	published-tiers	freemium
Primary source	https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot	https://sourcery.ai/security
Last checked	2026-10-18	2026-10-20
Official site	https://cursor.com/docs/bugbot	https://sourcery.ai/security

FAQ (from this dataset)

What is the difference between Cursor Bugbot and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning?

Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: pr-review, appsec. Cursor Bugbot-only tasks: remediation. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning-only tasks: sast, secrets-detection, sca, iac, code-quality. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.

Which one publishes pricing?

Cursor Bugbot: Usage-based on Individual and Teams plans; no separate Bugbot subscription. Cursor’s Bugbot page states Individual plans use included usage first, Teams bill from on-demand usage, and the average review costs $1.00–$1.50 depending on PR size. Enterprise trials are arranged with the account team. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans): Open Source plan free for public repositories; Pro $12 per developer/month billed annually ($15 monthly); Team (code review and security, nightly scans of 50 repos) $24 per developer/month billed annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise (self-hosted, SSO, own LLM keys) via demo. 14-day free trial.

Where are Cursor Bugbot and Sourcery AI code review and security scanning headquartered?

Cursor Bugbot publishes HQ in United States. Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) publishes HQ in United Kingdom.

Side-by-side data is generated from the open dataset. “Vendor-claimed” frameworks are as marketed by each vendor and not verified by Agent Index; framework tags indicate relevance, not certification. Request current quotes from each vendor before buying. This page does not rank or score vendors. Sponsored comparisons, if any, will be labelled.

Also in this use case

Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Cursor Bugbot or Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans). Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.

Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves. · Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) pair comparison

Use-case comparisons

AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)

More Cursor Bugbot comparisons

More Sourcery AI code review and security scanning (PR review bot with merge-blocking security checks, auto-approval of low-risk PRs and nightly codebase scans) comparisons