Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) (Cytix (Cytix Ltd)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) (Cytix (Cytix Ltd)) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field |  Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) |  StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Cytix (Cytix Ltd) | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United Kingdom · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Manchester software-change security platform that risk-scores every code change, automatically approves changes that fall within the customer's own policy and escalates the rest, then sends sandboxed AI pentest agents against high-risk changes and logs every decision and tool call as an audit-ready change record. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, appsec, risk assessment, workflow automation | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Not published | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | quote | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://cytix.io/solutions/agentic-pentesting | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-20 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://cytix.io/ | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec. Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals-only tasks: pen-test-management, risk-assessment, workflow-automation. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: remediation, vulnerability-management, agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security): Not published StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) publishes HQ in United Kingdom. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
Related
- Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Cytix agentic pentesting and automatic change approvals (change-driven software security)
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)