Endor Labs security agents vs StackHawk Wingman
Quick answer
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) (Endor Labs) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) (Endor Labs) and StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) (StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.)) are both listed in the Code security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset.
| Field | ||
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Endor Labs | StackHawk (StackHawk, Inc.) |
| HQ | United States · North America | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Code security | Code security |
| Also listed in | Code security, Security | Code security, Security |
| Summary | Pre-built AppSec agents that read Endor findings against your source, write SAST fixes or file exceptions, pick safe dependency upgrades and open PRs, and answer malware-exposure and CI/CD posture questions inside your coding agents. | Security plugin for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Cursor, GitHub Copilot, Codex, Antigravity) that runs dynamic tests against the running app during the coding session, has the agent triage and fix what it finds, then rescans to prove the fix before the pull request. Published at US$10 per user per month. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | — | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | — | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | appsec, sast, sca, remediation, vulnerability management | appsec, remediation, vulnerability management, agent platform with security integrations |
| Pricing (as published) | Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing. | Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales. |
| Pricing model | freemium | published-tiers |
| Primary source | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
| Last checked | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://www.endorlabs.com/platform/agentic-workflows | https://www.stackhawk.com/product/wingman/ |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Endor Labs security agents and StackHawk Wingman?
Both are listed under Code security. Shared tasks: appsec, remediation, vulnerability-management. Endor Labs security agents-only tasks: sast, sca. StackHawk Wingman-only tasks: agent-platform-security-integrations. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation): Free Developer tier (AURI, no account required); Core and Pro tiers and add-on products are 'Get started' / 'Get pricing' with no list prices on endorlabs.com/pricing. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents): Wingman: US$10 per user per month, unlimited apps, 14-day free trial (no card). Scale plan: contact sales.
Where are Endor Labs security agents and StackHawk Wingman headquartered?
Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) publishes HQ in United States. StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) publishes HQ in United States.
Listings tagged agent platform with security integrations are coding platforms with a documented scanner or vulnerability-fix workflow, not dedicated application-security products. Dedicated AppSec listings are compared on the AI code security agents table.
Use-case comparisons
- AI code security agents — 33 listings (Application security scanning, suggested or automated code fixes, and pull-request security review)
Related
- Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) alternatives
- StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) alternatives
- Best code security AI agents
More Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs Endor Labs security agents (agentic triage and remediation)
More StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents) comparisons
- Aikido AI AutoFix vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- AISLE (autonomous vulnerability discovery, triage and verified-fix agents) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amazon Q Developer security scanning vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)
- Black Duck Signal (agentic AI AppSec) vs StackHawk Wingman (find-fix-verify security for AI coding agents)