Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Opal Paladin
Quick answer
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index.
They share no framework tags in our dataset.
This is not a ranking.
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) (Hadrian) and Opal Paladin (Opal Security) are both listed in the Security category of Agent Index. They share no framework tags in our dataset. Only Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) is tagged for SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA.
| Field |  Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) |  Opal Paladin |
|---|---|---|
| Vendor | Hadrian | Opal Security |
| HQ | Netherlands · Europe | United States · North America |
| Primary category | Security | Security |
| Also listed in | Security, Code security | Security |
| Summary | On-demand penetration testing run by a fleet of AI hacker agents, paired with Hadrian Atlas for continuous external exposure management. | AI identity agent in Opal that reviews access requests, investigates context and approves, denies or escalates with recorded reasoning. |
| Frameworks (vendor-stated) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, DORA | — |
| Frameworks (vendor-claimed) | SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIS2, DORA, MITRE ATT&CK | — |
| Capabilities / tasks | pen test management, attack surface, exposure management, appsec | identity governance, access reviews |
| Pricing (as published) | Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). | Not published for Paladin. |
| Pricing model | published-tiers | quote |
| Primary source | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
| Last checked | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-18 |
| Official site | https://hadrian.io/products/nova | https://docs.opal.dev/docs/paladin/access-request |
FAQ (from this dataset)
What is the difference between Hadrian Nova and Opal Paladin?
Both are listed under Security. They share no task tags in this dataset. Hadrian Nova-only tasks: pen-test-management, attack-surface, exposure-management, appsec. Opal Paladin-only tasks: identity-governance, access-reviews. Differences are from stored category and task tags, not a ranking.
Which one publishes pricing?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting): Nova: from EUR 1,250 per test excluding VAT, bundles available; Atlas priced on total asset count (hadrian.io/pricing). Opal Paladin: Not published for Paladin.
Where are Hadrian Nova and Opal Paladin headquartered?
Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) publishes HQ in Netherlands. Opal Paladin publishes HQ in United States.
Also in this use case
Other verified listings that share a task tag or use-case group with Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) or Opal Paladin. Open a pair page or the use-case table — this is not a ranking.
- Amnify security agents (agent-driven code audit, AI pentesting, PR review and autofix pull requests) — German AppSec product from Düsseldorf: a team of agents audits repositories (SAST, secrets, SCA, IaC, CI/CD) and cloud accounts, triages signals so only confirmed findings surface, pentests running apps inside a verified scope with a separate agent reproducing every finding, reviews pull requests with a merge-blocking status check, and opens fix pull requests that run your tests but never merge themselves.
- Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) — Berlin identity-governance vendor's AI agent: once access is approved under the customer's policies, Agent Cake provisions seats in supported apps on the admin's behalf, removes all accounts during offboarding, and lets employees request access conversationally in Slack, inside a platform that discovers apps and AI agents beyond SSO. · Cakewalk Agent Cake (AI agent for SaaS access provisioning, deprovisioning and conversational access requests) pair comparison
- noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) — Italian agent for mid-sized companies and NIS2 entities without an in-house SOC: after verifying domain control it continuously discovers assets and assesses network, web apps and APIs, correlates findings with EPSS and CISA KEV, confirms exploitability with automated validation pentests, ranks risks by business impact and prepares NIS2, DORA and ISO 27001 reports; the team decides what to fix. · noze CyberAgent (AI agent for continuous attack-surface monitoring, automated validation pentesting and NIS2 evidence) pair comparison
Use-case comparisons
- Agentic pentesting AI agents — 33 listings (Autonomous or AI-assisted penetration testing, attack-surface testing and exploitable-path verification)
- Identity governance AI agents — 8 listings (Identity governance, access reviews and Conditional Access coverage)
Related
More Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) comparisons
- Andesite Human-AI SOC (Azimuth for Government) vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Conveyor vs Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting)
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Mondoo
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs Orca Security
- Hadrian Nova (agentic pentesting) vs SafeBase
More Opal Paladin comparisons
- 7AI agentic security platform vs Opal Paladin
- Abnormal AI Security Mailbox (Abnormal AI for Government) vs Opal Paladin
- Adaptive Security Agentic Email Security and Phish Triage vs Opal Paladin
- Aikido Attack AI Pentesting vs Opal Paladin
- AIpentix (agentic continuous security testing and agentic red teaming, by Swipergy) vs Opal Paladin